Iran main reason behind COVID-19 spread: Expert
“No voice rises above the
sound of battle.” This is how the Mullahs’ regime in Iran dealt with the
coronavirus spread, with a systematic blackout, repression and oppressing
whoever protests the deteriorating economic situation in the country.
In an interview with The Reference, journalist
Osama al-Hitaimi, an expert on Iranian affairs, talks about the future of Iran
and its proxies in the region, its influence in Iran and how it mainly contributed
to the spread of the coronavirus across the world.
How do you see
Washington’s steps to limit Iran’s influence in the region by imposing
sanctions?
There is no doubt that there
are two main reasons that Washington seeks to achieve behind these sanctions on
Tehran and its proxies; the first is to weaken Iran through its arms,
especially that it looks at Hezbollah as the example that should be copied to
the rest of neighboring countries, while the second reason, is to limit the
financial capabilities of the party, and thus, its popularity.
What do you
think about Iraq’s future?
The recent popular
revolution in Iraq that erupted in October 2019 and invaded central and
southern governorates, and is still active and dynamic until the moment, has
given everyone a spark of hope that Iraq can regain its sovereignty, and get
rid of the dual occupation that it has suffered over the past years, and was a
direct cause in vandalism and destruction of Iraq and its economy.
In this context, the future
of Iraq depends on the extent of the ability of the popular movement to
continue and insist on achieving its demands, foremost of which is forming a
government that is far from quotas or subordination to any external power,
especially Iran.
Do you see any
progress by Washington to end the Iranian existence?
American efforts to end the
Iranian presence in Iraq have failed to make any progress; Washington was not
only the first to allow the Iranian presence in Iraq but rather helped to root
it, and to grant Iran More opportunity In 2011, it decided to withdraw its
forces, to return in smaller numbers in the framework of the so-called war
against Daesh, which was being coordinated with Iran.
The point of the matter is
that the United States is willing to exert pressure on Iran, a desire to return
Tehran to the American House of Obedience and its continuation as a functional
country in the region and to thwart Tehran's persistent attempts to become a
regional power.
How can Iraq
liberate itself from Iranian influence?
I think the harder question
is about the future of Iraq, as Iran was able over the course of 17 years to
take over all the foundations in Iraq, and now, no official in Iraq can take a
single decision without taking Tehran’s permission first. So, it is important
to realize the danger of the Iranian project.
What about the
spread of coronavirus from Iran to neighboring countries?
Iran decided to hide news
regarding the spread of the virus from the public in anticipation for the
Parliamentary election that took place on February 21, this contributed to the
spread of the virus to many Arab and foreign countries. Therefore, we can say
that Tehran is mainly responsible for the spread of the virus internationally.
The IRGC was
announced as the managing authority of the virus, how do you see that?
The truth is that as far as
the Iranian regime seeks to utilize the virus to achieve political interests by
promoting that only the IRGC is the only body capable of confronting the virus,
this also highlights acute regime failure as the concerned official agencies
failed to do so.
Do you think
that Iran is taking advantage of the virus to cover up its deteriorating
economic situation?
We can say that the Iranian
regime has the ability to take advantage of any event to achieve its own
interests, as it promotes that the U.S. sanctions are one of the most factors
behind the spread of coronavirus, arguing that the country cannot import the
necessary medical assistance to confront the virus.
What about
Iran’s accusation that Washington launched a biological attack?
They are just statements
that are nothing more than political because they are not based until the
moment on explicit scientific evidence, and I believe that such statements are
consistent with the approach of the Iranian regime, which does not admit
failure at all, and tries to refer every disaster caused by its policies to
plots by the enemies.