Turkey gearing up to attack the Syrian Kurds again
Amidst the
ongoing transition disarray in the United States, Turkey might calculate that
the next few weeks are an opportune moment for it to once again strike the
Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in northeast Syria.
In late
October, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan threatened to begin another
military operation against the SDF.
“We see
that the terrorist organisation’s presence and the threats against our country
continue to increase in areas not under our control across our Syrian border,
despite all the promises given to us,” he said, clearly referring to the SDF.
“Unless
the promises given to us are delivered, and all the terrorists there are driven
out of the line we have determined, I would like to reiterate that we have
legitimate cause to take action whenever we deem necessary.”
“Turkey
has sufficient power to clear, if need be, all terrorist organisations from
Syria.”
In early
October, Turkey’s parliament approved a bill that extends the mandate for the
country’s cross-border campaigns in both Syria and Iraq until Oct. 30, 2021.
In October
2019, U.S. President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew U.S. troops from the
Syrian border following a phone call with Erdoğan. Mere days later, Turkey launched
operation Operation Peace Spring against the SDF, displacing thousands of
civilians. By the time Russia brokered a ceasefire later that month, Turkey and
its Syrian militia proxies had captured the town of Tal Abyad along with a
large swath of land between the two main Syrian Kurdish regions of Kobane and
Jazira that it still occupies to the present day.
Locals in
northeast Syria recently expressed fears that ongoing Turkish cross-border
bombings could indicate that Ankara might launch another offensive in the near
future. Turkey and its militia proxies have carried out at least 800 ceasefire
violations since last year, 138 of which have been in the town of Tel Tamer
alone.
With Trump
leaving office, analysts told Ahval News that Turkey might exploit the
transition period in Washington, which has been complicated by Trump’s
unwillingness to cooperate with the incoming Biden administration, to launch
another operation against the SDF.
“Turkey
may well try to exploit U.S. weakness during this awkward transition period,”
said Professor Joshua Landis, a Syrian expert and head of Middle East Studies
at the University of Oklahoma.
“President
Trump has made it clear that he wants to draw down U.S. troop presence in the
region and seeks to end the ‘forever wars,’” he said.
“President
Biden’s foreign policy team is not firmly in place yet, but he has surrounded
himself with liberal hawks who insist that the U.S. must retain its presence in
Syria to force a ‘political solution’ to Syria and help the Kurds.”
In
addition to this, President-elect Joe Biden has had disapproving things to say
about his Turkish counterpart and Turkey’s foreign policy.
“For this
reason, Turkish policymakers may believe that offence is the best defence,”
Landis said.
During the
transition period, Turkey could “press its advantage” while the outgoing
administration is preoccupied with reducing the number of U.S. troops in
Afghanistan and Iraq.
“It also
might make the incoming policymakers around Biden reassess their commitment to
the Kurds of Syria and the SDF,” Landis said. “They may not want to get dragged
into a fight with Turkey over northeast Syria.”
Süleyman
Özeren, a Turkey expert at George Mason University, foresees two very different
paths that Erdoğan could choose to take in the next couple of weeks.
For one,
Erdoğan might look at the economic crisis
and growing domestic political opposition in Turkey today and decide to
surprise everyone by offering a new peace deal to the Kurds.
Or, he
could “take the extra mile” and launch another military operation in northeast
Syria to “raise the bar” for negotiations with the Biden administration while
simultaneously consolidating popular support at home.
“It is
highly likely that he would choose the latter,” Özeren said.
As with
all of its cross-border operations into Syria since August 2016, Turkey will
need a green light from Russia. This is because Russia supports Syrian
President Bashar al-Assad, controls large parts of Syria’s airspace and has had
a troop presence in Syria’s northeast since the October 2019 U.S. drawdown.
Özeren
anticipates that Moscow will greenlight any future operation as it has in the
past.
“Biden’s
presidency would be more complex for both Russia and Turkey, so it could be
plausible that the Russians might give that green light to create a mess for
the upcoming Biden administration,” he said.
If Turkey
does attack northeast Syria again, the question then arises of which areas it
will attack and occupy. The last operation saw it occupy almost one-third of
the SDF-controlled region extending from the east bank of the Euphrates River
to the Iraqi border.
“Turkey
and its Syrian proxies might seek to attack and occupy the territory between
Tel Abyad and Ras al-Ain and toward Manbij, which has become a de facto buffer
zone between Turkey and its Syrian proxies and the Kurds,” Özeren said.
Aaron
Stein, Research Director at the Foreign Policy Research Institute, pointed out
that the Kurdish city of Kobane has been “a target circled on various Turkish
maps for years.”
In a
recent interview with Ahval, Hişyar Özsoy, the Vice co-Chair of Foreign
Affairs of the pro-Kurdish People’s
Democratic Party (HDP) in Turkey, also expressed his suspicion that Kobane
would be Turkey’s next target and alleged that
Russia has “been encouraging Turkey to attack
Kobane for the last two years.”
“Turkey
has not attacked until now simply because they made an agreement with the
Americans,” he said. “If the United States gives a green light, the next day
the Turkish army will attack Kobane.”
The U.S.
government officially opposes Turkey launching any more attacks in that
region.
“We have
been very clear that the United States strongly opposes any new military
operation by Turkey into northeast Syria,” a State Department spokesperson told
Ahval. “This has been conveyed to Turkey both publicly and privately on
numerous occasions.”
The
spokesperson noted that the United States imposed sanctions on Turkey in
response to the October 2019 operation, signalling Washington’s opposition to
the move. More importantly, the spokesperson added, the United States sought to
“encourage a rapid change in Turkish behaviour to end their offensive military
operations.”
“These
responses led to the statement agreed on Oct. 17 which has kept stable front
lines.”
Washington
expects Turkey to live up to its commitments under the Oct. 17 joint statement,
which include refraining from launching any additional offensive operations in
northeast Syria.
“Any new
offensive would further undermine regional stability and provide malign actors
with opportunities to exploit this instability for their own purposes,” the
spokesperson said.
Stein
wouldn’t be surprised if there was “some sort of military action” soon but
emphasized that this isn’t definitely going to happen.
“This is
all hypothetical, but any further attacks on the SDF aren’t likely to go over
well anywhere outside of Turkey,” he said.