Issued by CEMO Center - Paris
ad a b
ad ad ad

Al-Julani, from the Fight against Assad to a Confrontation with Zawahiri

Sunday 15/April/2018 - 01:27 PM
Al-Julani
Al-Julani
Rhama Mahmoud
طباعة

 In January 2011, Jabhat al-Nusra (Jabhat Fateh AL-Sham/Front of Conquerors of the Levant, at present) was formed, with the aim of bringing down the Assad regime in Syria. The Front went on with her fight against the Damascus regime, as a separate entity, with its leader, Abu Muhammad al-Julani desisting from a pledge of allegiance to al-Qaeda or any other Jihadist 

group.

When Daesh(ISIS) conquered vast swathes of Syria, in April 2013, the leader of Daesh, Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi announced the merger of the two organizations, The Islamic State in Iraq and Jabhat al-Nusra in Syria, into one, under the name of' 'The Islamic State in Iraq and Syria'. This formation was quick to disintegrate, when al-Julani rejected the merger, claiming he had not been consulted, and announced, in a recorded statement broadcast by Aljazeera satellite channel, his allegiance to the leader of al-Qaeda, Aymen al-Zawahiri, asking al-Zawahiri to act as arbiter between his organization and the Islamic State in Iraq. Then, al-Zawhiri rejected the unification of the two groups and asked the Islamic State in Iraq to carry on with the fight against the United States, leaving the Jihad in Syria to al-Nusra. The Islamic State refused.

 

In a surprise move, al-Julani declared disengagement with al-Qaeda, in July 2016, changing the name of his organization from 'Jabhat al-Nusra' to 'Jabhat Fateh al-Sham'. Although al-Zawahiri did not respond to this renunciation of pledge, the disengagement resulted in dissensions inside 'al-Nusra', as one splinter group refused to disengage from al-Qaeda, declaring the renunciation of a pledge to al-Zawahiri a heresy, an act of treason and a recoil. Another splinter group supported the decision taken by al-Julani, saying that the pledge given by al-Julani to Zawahiri was a military consent that may be abrogated, because it was an exceptional cosent and not a pledge to an Imam. By abrogating such a consent, they said, they were not becoming Khawarij, as they were not revolting against the authority of a Caliph. The fact that a more advisable act of prudence emerged, made it possible to abrogate the pledge.

 

Al-Zawihiri breaks his silence

 

Conflict escalated between the two splinter groups, between the pro-Qaeda group rejecting the renunciation of the pledge and the al-Julani group, represented in Jabhat Fateh al-Sham, especially after the arrest, in November 2017, of some of the leaders of the pro-Qaeda group by the Jabhat. Among those arrested were Eyad al-Tousi, aka Abu-Jleibeeb the Jordanian, and Sami al-Aridi, aka Abu Mahoud al-Shami, as both men refused the disengagement with al-Qaeda and incited dissension within the ranks of the new Front, set up by Jabhat al-Nusra.

 

In view of the escalating frictions between the two groups, al-Zawahiri broke his silence by getting As-Sahab (the cloud), which is the production house of al-Qaeda, on November 29, 2017, to disseminate a statement titled 'Let us fight them like a compact structure'. In that statement he accused al-Julani of having renunciated a pledge asserting that he had never agreed to relieve 'Jabhat al-Nusra' of their pledge, as this was a commitment that they had to abide by, and that it was haram (a sinful act) to renege on it.

 

On the other side, the official in charge of religious affairs in Hayat Tahrir al-Sham said, in a protracted statement on Telegram channels : 'Al-Qaeda has never been given a pledge. This was an agreement between our two organizations to work together in Syria'. He went on to accuse on of the leaders of al-Qaeda, named Atwan, of misrepresenting the disengagement to al-Zawhiri, because of disinformation given to him by the splinter group rejecting the disengagement.

 

The misunderstanding between Jabhat Fateh al-Sham and al-Qaeda came to an end through the good offices of a group of leading Jihadis who set up two committees for reconciliation, the first committee was called 'Reconciliation is Good', and among its members were Abu Qotada the Palestinian, Abu Muhammad al-Maqdisi, Abu Abdullah al-Hashimi, Abu Hothayfa al-Sudani and others.

 

As this committee could not get the job done, because Hayat Tahrir al-Sham had its reservations on some of its members, a new committee was set up, with the name 'The Disingagement Committee, And hold fast, all of you together'. The membership of this committee included, among others, Aba Abdel Karim, chairman, Aba Malik al-Shami, member, Sheikh Aba Qatada al-Albani, member and Sheikh Mokhtar al-Turki, member. In spite of the success of this committee in setting free those militants of al-Qaeda arrested by Hayat Tahrir al-Sham, it did not manage to reach a reconciliation among all al-Qaeda affiliates and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.

 

Among the reasons why al-Julani took a decision to detach himself from al-Qaeda and work in Syria as a separate entity are: the fact that a link to al-Qaeda made it look suspicious, and led to its name being blacklisted, as a terrorist organization, by the Global Coalition Against Terrorism, and its locations being bombarded, more than once. Another reason was that the Front wanted to project itself as a moderate political faction, so that it may be able to get funded by supporters of the non-Jihadist opposition movements. Tha last of the reasons for this was that al-Julani aspired for leadership and wanted to dominate the Jihadist scene in Syria, so that he might be in a position to amass the spoils of the victories achieved by the Front in Northern Syria, and claim those victories for himself and for his new organization.

   

 

 

"