Millions of Syrian civilians at grave risk if U.S., Russia fail to strike deal on U.N. aid deliveries
Parts of northern Syria will quickly face a massive and
deadly humanitarian crisis if the U.N. Security Council fails this week to
extend a resolution allowing the United Nations to deliver aid across the
Turkish-Syrian border, according to relief workers, Syrian civilians and the
Biden administration.
The resolution, which allows the United Nations to
coordinate aid shipments to Syria through only one border crossing, is set to
expire Saturday. Millions of Syrians dependent on the U.N.-led relief effort
would immediately be put at risk if it lapses, aid workers say.
Russia has promised for nearly a year to veto any
resolution allowing cross-border aid to continue, viewing its distribution to
areas held by opponents of President Bashar al-Assad, an ally of Moscow, as a
violation of Syria’s sovereignty. The Biden administration favors expanding
cross-border aid to Syria, and the debate over the resolution has emerged as a
high-profile test of whether the United States and Russia, at a moment of
escalating tensions, can identify issues on which to forge common ground.
Administration officials from President Biden on down
have described the aid issue as an example of the kind of cooperation they want
from Russia as they seek a path toward longer-term strategic accords on cyber
and nonproliferation issues.
Biden raised the border crossings at his summit last
month with Russian President Vladimir Putin, citing the “urgent need to
preserve and reopen the humanitarian corridors in Syria so that we can get food
— just simple food and basic necessities — to people who are starving to
death.”
While Putin made no commitment, White House national
security adviser Jake Sullivan said later: “We believe that there is scope for
the U.S. and Russia to work together on a positive outcome so that resolution
gets passed, that crossing gets sustained, and that other measures to alleviate
the suffering of the people of Syria are also adopted with the U.S. and Russia
working together.”
At the Bab al-Hawa crossing Tuesday, Syrians preparing to
return home from Turkey described the overwhelming reliance of relatives on humanitarian
aid. “There is no work” in Syria’s northern Idlib province, said a 31-year-old
man, sheltering from the sun under a tree along a road divider as a convoy of
U.N. vehicles sped by.
His relatives in Idlib, displaced by a large-scale Syrian
government offensive, received “everything” from aid agencies, he said,
including cash, food, detergent and clothes. “The aid from the U.N., from
Turkey, is the reason people there are alive,” said the man, who spoke on the
condition of anonymity to avoid attracting attention from authorities on either
side of the border.
“I am one person providing assistance to 26 people,” said
the man, who worked construction jobs in Turkey. “I cannot provide for this
number of people. I am not a working machine.”
The U.N.-coordinated aid operation began in 2014 after
the Security Council authorized the provision of supplies through four border
crossings into Syria from Turkey, Iraq and Jordan. Last year, the council
removed three of the authorized crossing points after Russian and Chinese
vetoes.
The United Nations’ shrinking access coincided with a
surge in demand for humanitarian aid over the past year in Idlib and nearby
areas, said Mark Cutts, the U.N. deputy regional humanitarian coordinator for
the Syria crisis. “There’s been a serious economic crisis in all of Syria on
both sides of the front lines. We’ve had covid, and we’ve had flooding in the
northwest, as well as continued airstrikes and shelling and further
displacement.”
The loss of border crossings meant that aid provision is
“logistically a lot more complicated,” he said. “Journeys that used to take one
or two hours sometimes take five times as long.”
With about 1,000 trucks carrying aid a month, the U.N.
operation through Bab al-Hawa “is one of the biggest aid operations anywhere in
the world,” Cutts said. If the resolution expires Saturday, “a lot of people
are going to suffer. Lives will be lost,” he said.
The health-care system in northwest Syria relied on the
United Nations for about 40 percent of its services, according to Mahmoud
Daher, the World Health Organization’s emergency team lead based in Gaziantep,
Turkey. The WHO, like other U.N. agencies, is pre-positioning supplies in
northwest Syria, including emergency kits for surgical interventions and
supplies for coronavirus outbreaks — stocks that could last four to six months.
But they would not be sufficient if medical needs in the
province surge, he said.
The debate over the resolution has also been a test of
the Biden administration’s ability to muster a broad coalition on an issue that
it knew would be contentious. The thrust of its argument has been that human
suffering in Syria has increased exponentially since Russia insisted that the
12-month extension expiring Saturday would be the last.
While the months-long U.S. diplomatic effort to marshal
most, if not all, of the Security Council to object to the Russian position has
been largely successful, there has been no public or private sign that Moscow
has changed its mind.
The draft resolution, sponsored by Norway and Ireland,
calls for two border crossings — Bab al-Hawa, as well as Yaroubia from Iraq
into northeast Syria — to remain open for 12 months. Linda Thomas-Greenfield,
the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, visited the Bab al-Hawa crossing
last month and has said that three are needed to keep more Syrians from dying.
After a closed-door council meeting on the subject
Tuesday, at which diplomats said the Russians stuck to their negative line,
they did not show up for a working group session for further discussions.
As it did twice last year, when its veto brought the
number of crossings down to two, then one, Russia has argued that insisting
that aid come across the border from Turkey is a violation of Syrian
sovereignty and little more than assistance to terrorists interspersed among
the millions of displaced Syrians in Idlib. Instead, it wants all international
aid to travel through the Assad government.
The Biden administration and the United Nations have said
that “cross-line” aid, distributed through and by Damascus into areas not under
Assad’s control, should also be increased, a concession the Russians have
largely ignored.
With the vote scheduled for Thursday, there is a strong
likelihood that the draft will be rewritten or that others will introduce a
pared-down version to include Bab al-Hawa alone. Russia may then insist, as it
did last year, on only a six-month extension. That could set up more tense
negotiations, this time in the midst of Syria’s brutal winter.