Iran obstinate in nuclear negotiations, world does not trust it
The nuclear agreement is going
through a dangerous stage due to Tehran's intransigence in dealing with the
countries of the 5+1 group, which includes the United States, Britain, France,
Germany, Russia and China.
Revival of the
agreement
Politico magazine indicated that US
Special Envoy for Iran Robert Malley does not trust the possibility of reviving
the nuclear agreement signed between Iran and major powers in 2015.
According to the American magazine,
Malley said that the agreement was “just a big question mark” and that “joining
a multinational agreement is not something we can fully control...there is
justification for a question mark, because the lack of a deal so far means that
the talks will continue in conjunction with Iran's progress in the nuclear
program.”
Provocative
steps
Malley pointed out that if Tehran
achieves nuclear progress, continues its provocative steps regarding the
nuclear program, and “its regional provocations... which are heading in another
path, this means moving away from reaching an agreement.”
The US envoy considered that it is
natural that “a return to the deal is on the table,” revealing that his country
has alternative options in the event the agreement is not revived, including
signing a new agreement separate from the old agreement that expires by 2030.
Otherwise, new sanctions will be imposed on Iran in coordination with the
Europeans.
Back to
negotiations
In a related context, Germany,
France and Britain called on the Iranian regime to return to the Vienna
negotiations to revive the nuclear agreement as soon as possible. The three
countries said in a joint statement, “We urge Iran to return to negotiations in
Vienna as soon as possible to reach a quick and successful outcome.”
The statement expressed the European
countries' growing concern about Tehran's nuclear activities after suspending
the Vienna negotiations at its request two months ago, accusing Tehran of not
committing to a date to complete the negotiations.
“We note with great concern recent
reports issued by the International Atomic Energy Agency confirming that Iran
has produced 20% enriched uranium metal for the first time and has greatly
increased its production capacity of 60% enriched uranium,” the statement
continued.
The statement stressed that these
two steps are essential in developing a nuclear weapon, and Iran has no
credible civilian need for either measure.
The IAEA recently issued a report
stating that Tehran is enriching uranium to a highly dangerous degree, while
Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh reiterated his assurances
that the country’s nuclear program is peaceful and has no military objectives,
adding that “the nuclear agreement preserves us the right to reduce our nuclear
commitments.”
Khatibzadeh added in a statement
that if all parties return to their commitments in the agreement and Washington
lifts the unilateral sanctions completely, practicably and verifiably, Iran
will immediately retract from reducing its nuclear commitments.
Iran had asked to suspend the Vienna
negotiations until its new president, Ebrahim Raisi, took over power, which
happened at the beginning of August. Despite that, the date for resuming the
negotiations has not yet been agreed upon.