Iran violates human rights under banner of religion: Young people respond with ‘white marriage’
Although the Iranian authorities
constantly rant with religious terms and extremist slogans, the reality inside
the country does not correspond religiously and socially with that language of
discourse, as the authorities have long since stopped applying religious
rulings in the field of justice to a large extent.
White marriage
Recently, Iranian media attention
focused on the issue of the penalty for adultery, after the Supreme Court in
Tehran sentenced a man and a woman accused of it to death, which has not
happened for a long time, but the court changed the way the sentence was
executed from stoning to hanging.
This is a rare event, as the hudud
(legal limits) have not been applied at all for many years, especially in such
cases, despite the wide spread of sexual relations outside marriage among young
people who seek to get rid of the state’s authority over them by any means and
resort to living together without marriage, in what is called white marriage.
Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said in
previous statements that the phenomenon of white marriage is an imperialist
scheme that seeks to destroy his country and eliminate the family in it by
spreading this phenomenon among young Iranian men and women.
Human rights
violations
Although Iran has stopped religious
sanctions, it has not refrained from practicing human rights violations on a
large scale. According to Amnesty International, Iran remains among the world's
countries with the most executions, as it carried out 246 sentences in this
regard in 2020. Amnesty's annual report on executions around the world stated
that the Iranian regime is solely responsible for half of the executions that
were carried out globally last year, and that Iran is the only country
witnessing the phenomenon of child executions. According to the report, at
least three people executed in Iran in the year 2020 alone were under the age
of 18 at the time of the crime.
It is noteworthy that the last
ruling came on the basis of the complaint of the wife of a convicted man at the
beginning of this year, when she presented to the police video tapes proving
the existence of a relationship between her husband and another woman. Although
she forgave her husband and his lover, the father of the lover’s husband filed
another lawsuit and demanded the most severe penalties, and the judges
sentenced the defendants to death for adultery, based on the evidence in the
case file. But the defendants appealed the verdict, and on appeal, the case was
heard again in the Supreme Court. After reviewing the case, the higher judges
upheld the death sentence according to the documents, videos, and the
defendants’ confession.