British intelligence fears use of digital technology by terrorists
The United Kingdom is working to
develop its international strategy to combat cross-border terrorism amid legal,
societal and regional challenges facing its security system, as well as the
tremendous technological development in the field of communications and
information, which has become a tool in the hands of extremists nearing the
level of use achieved by governments.
The head of the British Secret
Intelligence Service (MI6), Richard Moore, expressed his country's fears that
terrorists use the developments of the digital age and artificial intelligence
skills for their extremist activities, pointing to the international ambitions
of al-Qaeda and its threat to world peace.
Moore said in his speech at the
International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) on Tuesday, November 30,
that international terrorism is still a serious challenge facing the UK, adding
that he considers the threats of international terrorism among the foremost and
official files of the intelligence service.
Terror hits UK
The Liverpool attack reignited talk
about the activities of terrorist groups in Britain and the effectiveness of
government mechanisms in confronting them, as a taxi exploded on November 14 in
front of a city hospital in the northwest of the country, although he could not
reach it. The attack was classified as a terrorist attack.
The perpetrator of the Liverpool
operation had previously threatened passers-by with his weapon, although the
authorities did not deport him from the country, which drew criticism of the
government.
Given Moore’s speech about the
development of international terrorism methods, careful monitoring of
extremists' behavior remains an important step in countering violent
activities.
Challenges on
methods to counter terrorism
The British government faces various
challenges in confronting terrorism. From a legal point of view, the country's
constitutional articles and the resulting legal articles are still unable to
confront the emerging developments in this file, forcing the government to
circumvent these laws on more than one situation.
In mid-November, the government
announced its intention to amend the laws relating to revocation of citizenship
in order to be able to revoke the citizenship of extremists without prior
notification.
This problem became evident when the
Supreme Court annulled the government’s decisions to revoke the citizenship of
dozens of terrorists, which put the government in front of the problem of
amending laws, a problem that is renewed with most of the files that the
country deals with in the framework of international terrorism. It can track
them, but the laws challenge this trend.
In another situation, former Home
Secretary Sajid Javid went on to agree with the US government to hand over the
members of the Beatles ISIS cell to the United States to be executed there,
because the UK’s laws forbid execution and therefore the authorities would have
had to integrate them into society, which they see as a threat to its national
security.
While the Brexit agreement that
required the country’s exit from the European Union imposed information and
intelligence challenges for the government, this means depriving the data
shared by the bloc’s countries about terrorists, along with their fingerprints
and DNA.
Britain tried to complete a deal
with the European Union to keep it informed of this data after the exit, but
Germany refused this and led a current opposed to this request within the
European bloc.