Ukraine’s Zelensky Removes Top Officials in Bid to Contain Corruption Scandals
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has removed nearly a
dozen top officials as he tries to contain a series of corruption scandals and
shore up Western confidence in his administration at a critical moment in the
war.
Though the scandals are small compared with those of
previous Ukrainian governments—some of which were accused of stealing billions
in public funds—they are nonetheless a blow to Mr. Zelensky, who has garnered
praise at home and abroad for his leadership of the country during Russia’s invasion.
Mr. Zelensky’s decision to dispatch apparently tainted
officials, while others tendered resignations, underscores the importance of
maintaining a clean image, both for Ukrainian citizens, who are dying in the
thousands on the front lines and enduring economic hardship, and for Western
governments, which are giving Ukraine billions in aid despite their own tepid
economies. In the U.S., some Republicans have openly questioned whether the
country should continue to fund Ukraine at the same levels as last year.
In a series of public addresses this week, Mr. Zelensky
indicated he was seeking to clean house by dismissing officials of various
levels in ministries, the regions and law enforcement, and tried to present the
firings as proof of a break from corrupt regimes of the past.
“We will continue to take appropriate steps—the public will
see each of them,” he said during his nightly address on Tuesday. “Any internal
issues that hinder the state are being removed and will continue to be
removed.”
In Washington, a bipartisan group of senators who traveled
to Ukraine earlier this month said at a news conference on Capitol Hill that
the firings hadn’t shaken their confidence in Mr. Zelensky, but rather
demonstrated that he was taking allegations of corruption seriously. They said
they were assured while in the country that there is no evidence that U.S.
equipment or funds had been affected.
Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D., R.I.) said that a briefing the
lawmakers received in Ukraine at the U.S. Embassy gave them confidence that the
checks and balances in place were adequate, and that the Ukrainians were
working hard to demonstrate accountability, even in some cases with great
difficulty.
“When you’re actually running around being shot at, to make
sure you’re saving your missile tubes so that you can keep score correctly,
it’s not an easy ask,” Mr. Whitehouse said. “And they are not complaining.
They’re doing it because they know that we need to have that confidence in
America, and the embassy on the ground, knowing this, including our military
officials, are confident.”
Over the past year, the annual defense-policy bill and
multiple supplemental Ukraine funding bills passed by Congress have included
provisions requiring regular reports by inspector-general offices within the
federal agencies responsible for delivering the billions in economic,
humanitarian and military aid: the Defense Department, State Department and the
U.S. Agency for International Development.
Some Republicans have called for additional oversight and
audits of U.S. aid to Ukraine. A bill proposed by Sen. John Kennedy (R., La.)
would establish an inspector general solely dedicated to monitoring Ukraine
aid, modeled on the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction.
Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.) said at Tuesday’s news
conference that lawmakers pushing for continued aid to Ukraine aren’t asking
for a blank check. “We’re asking for a big check with oversight and scrutiny,”
he said. “And what was impressive to me, in fact, is that all of the scrutiny
and oversight so far has disclosed no fraud or waste. No misappropriation of
any of the military or humanitarian assistance that we’ve provided so far.”
Mr. Blumenthal said the firings were “very important because
it demonstrates what President Zelensky has told us, that there will be zero
tolerance for fraud or waste.”
Some Republicans reiterated their criticism of U.S. aid to
Ukraine after Mr. Zelensky’s anti-corruption moves.
“Ukraine is one of the most corrupt countries in the world
and the war with Russia doesn’t change that,” Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R.,
Ga.) said on Twitter on Tuesday. “How much of America’s hard earned tax dollars
are being stolen or going to people or things it wasn’t supposed to go to? We
will audit Ukraine.”
The dismissals in Ukraine included the removal on Tuesday of
the governors of five of the country’s regions, according to Taras Melnychuk,
the government’s representative in parliament. Six top officials in Kyiv were
also removed.
Though no reason was given for most of the dismissals, the
shake-up follows a series of public corruption allegations, and Mr. Zelensky
has decided to let go of some who were accused of malfeasance months ago.
Valentyn Reznichenko, who had been the governor of the
Dnipropetrovsk region, has been accused in local media of funneling more than
$40 million in government contracts to associates, including his girlfriend. He
couldn’t be reached for comment. The governors of the Kyiv, Sumy, Kherson and
Zaporizhzhia regions were also fired.
Deputy Defense Minister Vyacheslav Shapovalov resigned on
Tuesday, following allegations in the local media that the country’s military
was overpaying for food services. Mr. Shapovalov couldn’t be reached for
comment.
Kyrylo Tymoshenko, a deputy head of the presidential
administration who resigned on Monday, had been photographed driving a Porsche
that Ukrainian media said belonged to a businessman, and was accused of
appropriating for his own use a sport-utility vehicle donated to deliver aid.
In a post on Telegram on Tuesday, Mr. Tymoshenko thanked a list of people,
including Mr. Zelensky, but offered no reason for his resignation.
Ukraine’s deputy infrastructure minister, Vasyl Lozinskiy,
was caught accepting a bribe of $400,000 and arrested, according to Ukrainian
law enforcement. He was dismissed from his post earlier this week. Mr. Lozinskiy
couldn’t be reached for comment.
In addition, Mr. Zelensky signed a decree barring state
employees from leaving the country except on official government business.
The ban was an apparent response to reports in the Ukrainian
media last week that Deputy Prosecutor General Oleksiy Symonenko went on
vacation in December to Spain, where he drove a car belonging to a prominent
Ukrainian businessman. Mr. Symonenko has also resigned. He couldn’t be reached
for comment.
“Officials will no longer be able to travel abroad for
vacation or for any other nongovernmental purpose,” Mr. Zelensky said in his
video address. He added: “If they want to take vacations now, they will take
vacations outside the civil service.”
Ukraine is seeking more military aid from the West to
achieve a breakthrough amid what has turned into a grinding war, after Kyiv
toward the end of last year regained swaths of territory lost early in the
Russian invasion. The U.S. and its allies are funneling billions to prop up
Ukraine’s economy, along with the provision of military aid.
Some Republicans in the U.S., who now control the House of
Representatives, have called for more accounting of the money being sent to
Ukraine and questioned whether the U.S. should continue to offer billions in
aid.
Josh Hawley, a Republican senator from Missouri, said he
skipped Mr. Zelensky’s speech to Congress last month. “I didn’t want to be part
of a photo op asking for more money from the United States government when they
haven’t given us a single piece of accounting on anything they’ve spent,” he
said at the time.
The corruption accusations appeared small compared with past
scandals that have seen billions drained from public coffers. Former President
Viktor Yanukovych, for example, was accused of stealing billions from the state
before he fled to Russia amid mass street protests in 2014, leaving behind an
opulent palace with a garage replete with luxury cars and an animal park
including ostriches. He denied wrongdoing.
Since the ouster of Mr. Yanukovych, Ukraine has sought to
demonstrate progress in fighting corruption to draw closer to the West, opening
an anticorruption bureau with help from the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
But antigraft campaigners said progress was slow amid foot-dragging and
resistance among corrupted elites.
When European Union member states agreed to grant Ukraine
candidate status last June, they tasked the government with giving teeth to its
anticorruption offices. Ukraine has since then appointed an anticorruption
prosecutor, a post that had been vacant for two years.
The European Commission will report on Ukraine’s progress in
cracking down on corruption and reducing the influence of oligarchs in the
fall. That report will pave the way for discussions among member states about
whether the country is ready to begin accession talks with the bloc.
The EU has also linked some of its financial assistance to
Ukraine to steps to tackle corruption.
“Ukraine is of course expected to further strengthen the
fight against corruption in particular at high level through proactive and
effective investigations and a credible track record of prosecutions and
convictions,” Ana Pisonero, a European Commission spokeswoman, said on Tuesday
following the announcement of the firings and resignations.
Mr. Zelensky, a former actor in a sitcom where he played a
graft-busting president, ran for office pledging to root out corruption.
Even before the war, however, he faced criticism among
opponents and activists about not following through on his promise to end the
culture of graft.
Daria Kaleniuk, co-founder of the nongovernmental
Anticorruption Action Center, said that before the war, Mr. Zelensky, like past
presidents, protected his deputies who were accused of wrongdoing.
The dismissal of Mr. Tymoshenko—who like Mr. Zelensky worked
in entertainment before entering politics—was a good sign, Ms. Kaleniuk said,
but she added that the allegations about food procurement in the Defense
Ministry needed a more forceful response. Though the deputy minister resigned,
the minister of defense had denied wrongdoing.
“Usually in Ukraine, presidents don’t like firing their team
members,” in response to corruption allegations, she said. “It’s a step
forward, compared to how other presidents behaved.”