China’s Economic Support for Russia Could Elicit More Sanctions
President Biden and his top officials vowed this week to
introduce additional sanctions aimed at impeding Russia’s war efforts against
Ukraine. But the administration’s focus is increasingly shifting to the role
that China has played in supplying Russia with goods that have both civilian
and military uses.
As one of the world’s biggest manufacturers of products like
electronics, drones and vehicle parts, China has proved to be a particularly
crucial economic partner for Russia.
Beijing has remained officially unaligned in the war. Yet
China, along with countries like Turkey and some former Soviet republics, has
stepped in to supply Russia with large volumes of products that either
civilians or armed forces could use, including raw materials, smartphones,
vehicles and computer chips, trade data shows.
Administration officials are now expressing concern that
China could further aid Russia’s incursion by providing Moscow with lethal
weapons. While there is no clear evidence that China has given weapons and
ammunition to Russia, Secretary of State Antony J. Blinken warned in recent
days that China may be preparing to do so.
President Biden, speaking in Kyiv on Monday, said the United
States and its partners would announce new measures targeting sanctions evasion
this week. He did not specify whether those actions would be directed at Moscow
or its trading partners.
“Together we have made sure that Russia is paying the price
for its abuses,” he said the next day in Warsaw.
And in a speech on Tuesday at the Council on Foreign
Relations, Wally Adeyemo, the deputy Treasury secretary, said the United States
would be working “to identify and shut down the specific channels through which
Russia attempts to equip and fund its military.”
“Our counterevasion efforts will deny Russia access to the
dual-use goods being used for the war and cut off these repurposed
manufacturing facilities from the inputs needed to fill Russia’s production
gaps,” he said.
The comments came on the same day that Wang Yi, China’s top
diplomat, visited Moscow.
The actions that the United States has taken against Russia
in partnership with more than 30 countries constitute the broadest set of
sanctions and export controls ever imposed against a major economy. But this
regime still has its limits.
One year into the war, the Russian economy is stagnant, but
not crippled. The country has lost direct access to coveted Western consumer
brands and imports of the most advanced technology, like semiconductors. But
individuals and companies around the world have stepped in to provide Russia
with black market versions of these same products, or cheaper alternatives made
in China or other countries.
Goods appear to be finding their way to Russia, just through
a longer route. Exports from European countries to countries like Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan have
exploded, as have exports from those countries to Russia, according to Matthew
Klein, an economics writer who is tracking trends in trade volumes. Both this
data, and Russian tax collections, suggest that the country’s overall imports
have essentially recovered to pre-war levels, he said.
In particular, the United States and its allies appear to
have had limited success in stopping the trade of so-called dual-use
technologies that can be used in both military equipment and consumer goods.
The United States included many types of dual-use goods in
the export controls it issued against Russia last February, because the goods
can be repurposed for military uses. Aircraft parts that civilian airlines can
use, for example, may be repurposed by the Russian Air Force, while
semiconductors in washing machines and electronics might be used for tanks or
other weaponry.
Top U.S. officials warned their Chinese counterparts against
supporting Russia’s war effort after the invasion of Ukraine last year, saying
there would be firm consequences. While China has been careful not to cross
that line, it has provided support for Russia in other ways, including through
active trade in certain goods.
The United States has cracked down on some of the companies
and organizations providing goods and services to Russia. In January, it
imposed sanctions on a Chinese company that had provided satellite imagery to
the Wagner mercenary group, which has played a large role in the battle for
eastern Ukraine. In December, it added two Chinese research institutes to a
list of entities that supply the Russian military, which will restrict their
access to U.S. technology.
But tracking by research firms shows that trade in goods
that the Russian military effort can use has flourished. According to the
Observatory of Economic Complexity, an online data platform, shipments from
China to Russia of aluminum oxide, a metal that can be used in armored
vehicles, personal protective equipment and ballistic shields, soared by more
than 25 times from 2021 to 2022.
Shipments of minerals and chemicals used in the production
of missile casings, bullets, explosives and propellants have also increased,
according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity. And China shipped $23
million worth of drones and $33 million worth of certain aircraft and
spacecraft parts to Russia last year, up from zero the prior year, according to
the group’s data.
Data from Silverado Policy Accelerator, a Washington
nonprofit, shows that Russian imports of integrated circuits, or chips, which
are crucial in rebuilding tanks, aircraft, communications devices and weaponry,
plummeted immediately after the invasion but crept up over the past year.
In December, Russia’s imports of chips had recovered to more
than two-thirds of their value last February, just before the war began,
according to Silverado. China and Hong Kong, in particular, together accounted
for nearly 90 percent of global chip exports to Russia by value from March to
December.
Shipments from China to Russia of smart cards,
light-emitting diodes, polysilicon, semiconductor manufacturing equipment and
other goods have also risen, the firm said.
Relations between the United States and China have soured in
recent weeks after the flight of a Chinese surveillance balloon across the
United States early this month. But divisions over Russia are further straining
geopolitical ties. A meeting between Mr. Blinken and Mr. Wang, his Chinese
counterpart, on the sidelines of the Munich Security Conference on Saturday
night was particularly tense.
U.S. officials have been sharing information on China’s
activities with allies and partners in their meetings in Munich, a person familiar
with the matter said.
On “Face the Nation” on Sunday, Mr. Blinken said he had
shared concerns with Mr. Wang that China was considering providing weapons and
ammunition to aid Russia’s campaign in Ukraine, and that such an action would
have “serious consequences” for the U.S.-Chinese relationship.
“To date, we have seen Chinese companies — and, of course,
in China, there’s really no distinction between private companies and the state
— we have seen them provide nonlethal support to Russia for use in Ukraine,”
Mr. Blinken said.
“The concern that we have now is, based on information we
have, that they’re considering providing lethal support,” he added. “And we’ve
made very clear to them that that would cause a serious problem for us and in
our relationship.”
U.S. officials have emphasized that China by itself is
limited in its ability to supply Russia with all the goods it needs. China does
not produce the most advanced types of semiconductors, for example, and
restrictions imposed by the United States in October will prevent Beijing from
buying some of the most advanced types of chips, and the equipment used to make
them, from other parts of the world.
Russia is unable to produce precision missiles today because
the country no longer has access to leading-edge semiconductors made by the
United States, Taiwan, South Korea and other allied sources, a senior
administration official said on Monday.
“While we are concerned about Russia’s deepening ties with
them, Beijing cannot give the Kremlin what it does not have, because China does
not produce the advanced semiconductors Russia needs,” Mr. Adeyemo said during
his remarks. “And nearly 40 percent of the less advanced microchips Russia is
receiving from China are defective.”
But Ivan Kanapathy, a former China director for the National
Security Council, said that most of what Russia needed for its weapons were
less advanced chips, which are manufactured in plenty in China.
“The U.S. government is very well aware that our export
control system is designed in a way that really relies on a cooperative host
government, which we don’t have in this case,” Mr. Kanapathy said.
He added that it was “quite easy” for parties to circumvent
export control through the use of front companies, or by altering the names and
addresses of entities. “China is quite adept at that.”