Chechnya has welcomed Isis returners
The return of hundreds of women and children from
Syria and Iraq has become a major issue for Russia
The Chechen human rights advocate has binders filled
with photographs of young women and children, as well as their last known
locations: Mosul, towns near Raqqa, or sometimes just “tent camp”.
Then there are the pleas for help sent over
WhatsApp. “We aren’t dangerous,” wrote Maria, a Russian in the Ain Issa refugee
camp in Syria. “Maybe there are some who are dangerous, but we should not all
be punished for them.”
Altogether, family members have appealed to Saratova
to find at least 1,800 Russian-speakers who have disappeared into Iraq and
Syria, many of whom arrived in the two countries to live under Isis. “We need
to hurry or there won’t be anyone left to return,” she said.
Women like them have been dubbed “Isis brides” in
the west, and their possible return has sparked a fiery public debate, with
governments taking unprecedented steps to block their repatriation.
Shamima Begum, the teenager who traveled from east
London to Syria in 2015, had her British citizenship revoked. The United States
made a similar decision to block the return of Hoda Muthana, an Alabama woman.
Russia has a far larger problem. Vladimir Putin has
claimed as many as 4,000 Russian citizens traveled to Syria and Iraq, and
another 5,000 from other ex-Soviet countries. Saratova says relatives are
seeking at least 700 women from countries such as Russia, Kazakhstan, and
Uzbekistan, and more than 1,100 children.
The campaign for their return has found an unlikely
champion in Ramzan Kadyrov, the strongman ruler of Chechnya, whose regime has
long been accused of brutal reprisals against Islamist insurgents and their
families.
However, Kadyrov has lobbied Vladimir Putin for the
return of Russian-speakers from Isis and helped organise nearly a dozen
evacuation flights from Syria to Grozny, the predominately Muslim capital of
Chechnya.
Observers suggest that he has various motivations:
keeping potential insurgents under watch, promoting his stature as a Muslim
leader, and a genuine belief, coloured by a patriarchal worldview, that the
women who emigrated were bound to follow their husbands into Isis.
“From the humanitarian point of view, this is a very
strong and quite unexpected position,” said Ekaterina Sokirianskaya, the
director of the Conflict Analysis and Prevention centre and an expert on the
north Caucasus.
Supporters of the scheme, which brought back 21
women and more than 100 children in 2017, claimed that repatriating those who
had lived under Isis would help keep the country safer.
“These people need to be brought back, so that
they’re under the control of our law enforcement agencies,” said Saratova, who
was appointed by Kadyrov to a committee that manages the repatriation
process.“They are more dangerous there than here.”
But the scheme has its opponents and was suspended
abruptly in 2017 after complaints from senior officials in Russia’s security
services. Evacuations of children resumed only in December 2018. Women are no
longer repatriated.
Zalina Gabibulayeva, a mother of five who now lives
in Grozny, was on the last flight out of Syria. She seemed an unlikely
candidate for clemency. Her first husband had fought in the insurgency in
Dagestan and was killed in 2010. In 2012, she was sentenced to two years in
prison after police found a bomb in the trunk of her car, which she said was
planted.
While the Chechen government has portrayed the women
it wants to repatriate from Syria as obedient wives, each case is unique.
Gabibulayeva said that she was single and made her own decision when she
slipped across the Turkish border in 2014. “I had religious motivations,” she
said during an interview in Grozny. “I thought it was sharia. I wanted sharia.”
Gabibulayeva settled in Tabqa, a city she called
“peaceful” at first but she said she soon grew disappointed with Isis’s strict
rules, wanton use of violence and the cost of the approaching war. “At first,
there were more good people than bad,” she said. “They killed them like cannon
fodder, sending them to die in this war.” Executions for legal violations were
also common, she said. She denied taking part in violence.
Single women were confined to a general barracks and
not let out alone, so she quickly married, she said. Her third husband was
killed in a drone strike less than a year after they wed. As the war drew
closer and aerial bombardments became more frequent, she and her fourth husband,
a Macedonian, decided it was time to leave.
They paid to be smuggled out of Isis territory in
mid-2017 and surrendered to Kurdish forces in the country’s north.
Gabibulayeva, who was pregnant with her fifth child a the time, gave birth in
al-Hawl refugee camp. “They didn’t even bring me to the hospital, though I
asked them,” she said.
Her husband was arrested and extradited to
Macedonia, where he is now in prison. She spent four months in camps before she
was suddenly flown back to Russia, where a court in Dagestan convicted her of
joining an illegally armed group. She was sentenced to prison, but given a
deferment of more than a decade because she has young children.
She considers herself lucky to have got out alive.
“When the war was at its peak, when the children were between life and death,
of course you choose prison over the death of your kids,” she said.
Gabibulayeva and another returnee, Zagidat
Abakarova, a mother of four, said that they had been subjected to intense
scrutiny after returning to Russia, with regular interrogations and police
visits in her native Dagestan. She moved to Chechnya, she said, because
government forces had been more lenient. Russia has no federal guidelines for
repatriation, and each region has dealt with returnees in its own way.
She assumed that their phones and other means of
communications were being monitored, but said that women who had lived under
Isis no longer posed a threat.
Not everyone agrees. In November, Alexander
Bortnikov, head of Russia’s federal security service, said that brining women
back was dangerous: “It’s no secret that these women and even children are used
by terrorist leaders as recruiters, suicide attackers, for perpetrating
terrorist attacks and as gobetweens.”
Putin has also spoken publicly in support of
repatriating children, although he has not addressed the question of women.
Evacuation flights from Syria suddenly resumed for children born in Russia late
last year, with 30 children evacuated in December and more.
Observers say that Russia’s approach is flawed but
has shown more readiness to repatriate those who left for Isis than any western
government.
“Russia has one of the most active programmes on
repatriation of children globally and should be given credit for it,” Tanya
Lokshina, of Human Rights Watch, said. But “given all that hope to the families
desperate to get daughters and grandkids back from Syria and Iraq – and then
suspending the original programme for a year without any explanations, it was a
huge and unjustified blow to those families.”
Some mothers still have hope their daughters will be
found alive. Dzhannet Erezhebova has been searching for her daughter Ziyaret
for more than two years.
“If I disappear, please don’t leave my children
here, find them,” Ziyaret texted from Mosul in November 2016, where she was
living in a barracks for widows with her three children. Her husband had
already died in a bombardment.
It was the last time time that mother and daughter
spoke, and Erezhebova has spent more than two years searching for clues that
her daughter and three children escaped the city.
“I have been burying her and bringing her back to
life all this time,” Erezhebova said . “She deserves another chance.