Ali and pilgrimages to the Brotherhood supreme guide's office
In the summer of 2006, the Muslim Brotherhood leadership tried to win over a number of journalists and media figures.
Acting
on its behalf was the Media Committee of the organization. The committee
launched a new campaign to neutralize the media. Called "Listen from us,
not about us", the campaign sought to pacify organization detractors.
At
this time, Abdul Rahim Ali conducted studies and researches that criticized the
international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood. They lashed out at Muslim
Brotherhood schemes to reach power. The Brotherhood leadership was very angry
at the studies and researches, especially because they were published in a
number of international newspapers. They contained valuable information that
made them different from anything that was published about the Brotherhood in the
media.
The
Brotherhood realized early on that Ali is a journalist with vision and
information. This was why it felt afraid of his work about its activities both
inside Egypt and outside it.
The
Brotherhood failed in winning Ali over. Unlike most journalists and media
figures, Ali did not visit the office of the supreme guide of the Muslim
Brotherhood in Cairo.
In
the summer of 2009, journalist Dalia Abdul Rahim wrote a series of articles
that disclosed new secrets about the entities affiliated to the international
organization of the Muslim Brotherhood in the Arab region and Europe. She
mentioned the names of some of the international leaders of the Brotherhood who
were not known to be affiliated to the organization before that. The articles
were published in the Arabic language weekly magazine, October.
The
articles were met with extreme anger inside the office of the supreme guide of
the Muslim Brotherhood and among the leaders of the international organization
of the Muslim Brotherhood. Some of the people whose names were mentioned in the
articles sent letters to the editorial board of the magazine to deny links with
the Muslim Brotherhood and threaten to sue the magazine.
This
was when a friend of mine, the son of one of the leaders of the international
organization of the Muslim Brotherhood, called me from the UK. He used to visit
the office of the supreme guide of the Brotherhood in Cairo, even as he did not
agree with the ideas of the organization.
This
friend told me that the October magazine articles made the members of
the office of the supreme guide of the Brotherhood very angry and that the office
collected information about the journalist who wrote the articles. They wanted
to know whether this journalist was related to Abdul Rahim Ali.
The
leaders of the organization made sure that Dalia was none, but Ali's daughter
and that the information she put in the articles had come out directly from his
office.
My
friend told me – in my capacity as the person responsible for political Islam as
a news beat in the magazine – that the articles caused a big problem between
the members of the supreme guide's office and the leaders of the international
organization of the Muslim Brotherhood. He even told me that the office had
already been blacklisted because it failed to control information published in
the media about the Brotherhood in Egypt.
According
to my friend, the articles uncovered the sleeper cells of the international
organization of the Muslim Brotherhood around the world. They mentioned the names
of unknown Egyptian and Arab members of the Brotherhood who lived outside the
Arab region. These figures were part of the international business network of
the organization.
He
also told me that the information Ali leaked in this regard raised the issue of
the monopoly the Egyptian branch of the Muslim Brotherhood imposed on top posts
inside the supreme guide's office. Some leaders of the international
organization tried to use this to pull the carpet from under the feat of the
supreme guide's office in Egypt by spreading information that this office was
no longer under control. The same leaders tried to show that the members of the
office of the supreme guide did nothing at all when an Egyptian journalist
gained access to sensitive information about the organization.
The
revelations made to me by my friend did not surprise me. A few days earlier, the
same man talked to me about a number of reports I wrote for the same magazine
about Brotherhood figures who managed to infiltrate police and the judiciary in
Egypt. Titled, "Secret Files of the Brotherhood", the reports
included an interview I conducted with Entissar Abdelmonem, the first
Brotherhood renegade. The reports prompted senior Brotherhood figure Essam
al-Erian to write an article in reaction to a newspaper affiliated to a
political party that had understandings with the Muslim Brotherhood.
I
learned then that the Media Committee of the Brotherhood wanted to infiltrate
media institutions in a systematic manner. It wanted to do this by winning some
journalists over to the Brotherhood's side. The aim was for those journalists
to let the Brotherhood Media Committee get information about the reports that
would be published about the Brotherhood in their newspapers. They were also
meant to show whether the information included in these reports was given to
the media institutions by security agencies or by Brotherhood insiders.
The
Brotherhood shuddered at the prospect of Ali leaking more information about it,
especially with the Brotherhood reaching understandings with the Hosni Mubarak
regime then.
Mubarak's
son and rumored successor, Gamal, had reportedly met Brotherhood senior figures
Mahmud Ezzat and Khairat al-Shattir at a hotel on the outskirts of Cairo. Those
meeting reportedly discussed potential support by the Brotherhood to a
presidential bid by Gamal in return for allowing the Muslim Brotherhood to have
its own political party.
Another
credible source, who was responsible for the northern Cairo region inside the
Brotherhood, told me that the leaders of the Brotherhood hated Ali personally
and analyzed the studies and researches he conducted. They did this, the source
said, to be able to answer their members if they asked them about these studies
and researches.
The
same source told me that the Brotherhood would never forget that Ali was the
journalist who uncovered links between the organization and jihad camps in
Afghanistan. Ali showed that the Brotherhood maintained those links with the
camps through the Humanitarian Aid Committee at the Arab Medical Association
which was headed by former senior Brotherhood figure Abdelmonem Abulfotouh. The
Brotherhood controlled the committee for long through Abulfotouh and Ashraf
Abdulghaffar, another Brotherhood figure. Both men contributed to founding the
Mujahedin Services Office. The office offered services to those who went to
Afghanistan from other countries to fight the Russian invaders. The same
mujahedin founded al-Qaeda later.
In
the second half of 2012, the Muslim Brotherhood was in a triumphant mood. It
prepared to take revenge on the journalists and media figures who criticized it
over the years in the past, including Ali of course.
Ali,
on the other hand, was preparing to launch a huge media institution that would
put Islamist movements at the center of its interests. He also prepared to
launch a newspaper and a gate, namely al-Bawaba News and the Islamist
Movements Portal, with the same interests.
The
international organization of the Muslim Brotherhood cannot allow Ali to move
his battle with it to an international stage, especially to the French capital
Paris, with the establishment of the Center for Middle East Studies in Paris.
The center focuses on dynamic Islam and the dangers Islamist movements pose to
Western societies.
Ali
stood in the frontline of the battle against international terrorism. He
disclosed many of the schemes drawn up by Qatar and international terrorism
sponsors. He put the financing reaching militant groups in different forms
under the spotlight. He also organized several international conferences in the
past months which opened the door for a host of international terrorism experts
to speak and throw light on the funding Qatar offers to radicals around the
world.
It
is no surprise then that the leaders of the international organization of the
Brotherhood will plan to take revenge on Ali by stopping him from uncovering
their schemes in the West, especially after their regime fell down in Egypt and
the Arab region.
The
organization now finds a good chance to take revenge on Ali by inciting against
him and accusing him of anti-Semitism. In this, it uses a notorious French
journalist called Romain Caillet to act as its representative in a proxy war
aiming at slandering Ali.
Caillet
has started a campaign in which he accuses Ali of being "obsessed"
with the "Zionist conspiracy theory". He maintains the campaign
through a number of tweets.
A
French site took these tweets and made them fodder for its content. The same content
spread to other Zionist sites in France rapidly. Twenty-four hours later, the
same tweets featured on the site of the Israeli newspaper Times of Israel.
The
strange thing still is that most of the material published on all these sites
was written in the same manner which proves that their publication was
coordinate. This proves that Qatar joined hands with Israel in organizing this
campaign.
Caillet's
incitement was not a work done haphazardly. It was well calculated by Qatar.
Caillet
converted to Islam in 1997 at the age of 20. Leaders inside an Islamic center in
Paris controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood convinced him to convert to Islam.
He admired the ideas of Sayyed Qotb, Hassan al-Banna and Abdullah Azzam. He
joined a Salafist jihadist organization, before he joined Daesh and moved to
Iraq, Syria and Libya to be part of the organization's camps in them.
In
2005, Caillet came to Egypt under the pretext of studying Arabic. He lived in a
flat in Nasr City in Cairo. He lived with two other French radicals, including
Fabien Clain who read out the audio in which Daesh claimed responsibility for
staging the November 2015 attacks in Paris.
Caillet
was questioned by the Anti-Terrorism Sub-Directorate, a division of the French
judicial police, in 2008. He was released, but was put under police
surveillance. Caillet was also included in a list of those holding jihadist
ideas.
Caillet
worked as an anti-terrorism advisor for the French BFMTV which is owned
by the Israeli businessman Patrick Drahi. Nonetheless, he was fired in 2014,
after the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur published information
about his relationship with some Muslim Brotherhood and jihadist figures in
France.
All
this information shows that Qatar can easily start a dirty war against all
those who work to uncover its financing of terrorist and takfiri groups as well
as terrorist operations inside the Arab region and in European states. It does
this in cooperation with the Zionist lobby.