Vatican invokes Cardinal George Pell's 'right to appeal' after child sexual abuse conviction upheld
The most senior Catholic cleric in the world to be
convicted of child sexual abuse, Cardinal George Pell, has lost his appeal
against his conviction, but maintains he is innocent.
In a brief statement issued after the decision the
Vatican reiterated that Pell maintained his innocence, and that it was now
“Pell’s right to appeal to the high court”.
“At this time, together with the church in
Australia, the Holy See confirms its closeness to the victims of sexual abuse
and its commitment to pursue, through the competent ecclesiastical authorities,
those members who commit such abuse,” the statement also said. No mention was
made of stripping Pell of his cardinal title.
On Wednesday the Victorian court of appeal in
Melbourne, Australia, dismissed Pell’s appeal, with two of the three appellant
judges describing the complainant who accused Pell as a compelling, truthful
witness.
The jury had not been unreasonable in convicting
Pell on one count of sexual penetration of a child under the age of 16 and four
counts of an indecent act against a child under the age of 16, the chief
justice, Anne Ferguson, and appeal court president justice, Chris Maxwell,
found.
A third judge, Mark Weinberg, disagreed, finding the
complainant was inclined to embellish aspects of his testimony and that he
could not exclude the possibility that some of what he said was concocted. But
in the court of appeal judges are required only to reach a majority decision.
Pell was escorted back to jail, where he will
continue to serve a six-year sentence for sexually abusing two 13-year-old
choirboys in 1996, while he was archbishop of Melbourne. After Sunday solemn
mass at St Patrick’s Cathedral in Melbourne, Pell orally raped one of the boys
in the priest’s sacristy and indecently assaulted both of them. Pell offended
again against one of the boys about a month later, when he grabbed the boy’s
genitals in the church corridor, once more after Sunday solemn mass.
Throughout his evidence, [the complainant] came
across as someone who was telling the truth,” Ferguson said. “He did not seek
to embellish his evidence or tailor it in a manner favourable to the
prosecution. As might have been expected, there were some things which he could
remember and many things which he could not. And his explanations of why that
was so had the ring of truth.”
The judges unanimously agreed that Pell’s other two
grounds of appeal, which concerned legal issues, failed. He will be eligible
for parole in 2022.
Through his lawyer the complainant issued a
statement, saying: “Some commentators have suggested that I reported to the
police somehow for my own personal gain.
“Nothing could be further from the truth. I have
risked my privacy, my health, my wellbeing, my family. I have not instructed
any solicitor in relation to a claim for compensation. This is not about money
and never had been. Although my faith has taken a battering it is still a part
of my life, and part of the lives of my loved ones.”
The second victim died of a heroin overdose at the
age of 30 in 2014, and his father shed tears after the appeal dismissal.
In a statement, Pell’s spokeswoman said the cardinal
was “obviously disappointed with the decision today”.
“However his legal team will thoroughly examine the
judgment in order to determine a special leave application to the high court.
Cardinal Pell maintains his innocence. We thank his many supporters.”
Pell was made a Companion of the Order of Australia
in 2005 for his service to the Catholic church and for his work in education
and social justice. Following the court decision, Australia’s prime minister,
Scott Morrison, said he believed Pell would be stripped of those honours.
“That is a process that is done independently, and
that course will now follow,” he said.
The archbishop of Melbourne, Peter Comensoli, called
upon the public to respect the court’s decision. He said that his thoughts and
prayers were with the man who had brought Pell before the courts.
“I humbly
acknowledge it has been a challenging time for him, and I stand ready to offer
pastoral care and spiritual help, should he seek it,” Comensoli said. Pell,
too, would receive care. “In Christian charity, I will ensure that Cardinal
Pell is provided pastoral and spiritual support while he serves the remainder
of his sentence, according to the teaching and example of Jesus to visit those
in prison,” he said.
The president of the Australian Catholic Bishops
Conference, Archbishop Mark Coleridge, offered similar sentiments, saying:
“This has been and remains a most difficult time for survivors of child sexual
abuse and those who support them”.
“We acknowledge the pain that those abused by clergy
have experienced through the long process of the trials and appeal of Cardinal
Pell,” Coleridge said. “We also acknowledge that this judgment will be
distressing to many people.”
The decision and reasons from the appellant judges
ran to some 300 pages, but Ferguson read a summary of the judgment to a court
packed with media, survivors and Pell supporters on Wednesday.
“Cardinal Pell’s conviction and this appeal have
attracted widespread attention, both in Australia and beyond,” she said.
“He is a senior figure in the Catholic church and is
internationally well known. As the trial judge, Chief Judge Kidd, commented
when sentencing Cardinal Pell, there has been vigorous and sometimes emotional
criticism of the cardinal and he has been publicly vilified in some sections of
the community. There has also been strong public support for the cardinal by
others. Indeed, it is fair to say that his case has divided the community.”
She said it was important that Pell was not made a
scapegoat for any perceived failings of the Catholic church to address child
sexual abuse. But she was unequivocal about her and Maxwell’s judgment in
relation to the five charges on which Pell was convicted.
“The complainant was a very compelling witness, was
clearly not a liar, was not a fantasist and was a witness of truth,” she said.