The Sufism... between the liberal approach and the confrontation of Islamist streams
Introduction
Sufism has been known throughout its
history to withdraw from the political process, which considered one of the
Sufism's characteristics in general.
The Arab movement allowed all political
streams to form a political identity for the transitional period. Which
resulted in the emergence of some new political entities because of their
organizational capacity and their political project to lead the state to a safe
phase.
The wide masses that have revolt against
the previous regimes believed that it is necessary to change the political
system and its constituents. Then the Islam's entities emerged and presented
themselves as an alternative to these regimes.
The dominant feature during the
transitional period was the entry of most of the political streams and forming
political parties, which took part in the elections after the Arab Spring
revolutions, and achieved great successes at the level of parliamentary and
presidential elections at the level of the Arab world.
The Islamist movement (the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Salafist Group, the Islamic Group, the Jihad Group) emerged as
a strong political streams that won a majority in the elections of the People's
Assembly and Shura Council.
Which later colored the political
process with the Islamic character and the intellectual bases of those groups
that applied to post-revolutionary societies.
And then turned to political authority
of a religious nature only, and introduced new concepts of political life such
as the terms of "halal, haraam, takfir,". As well as developing ideas
that are contrary to liberal tendencies, and political parties that use the
mechanisms of democracy as a tool to gain power.
Islamic streams failed to provide a
political model that could lead the Arab countries to achieve Islamic
principles and thus achieve the social justice that these revolutions called for.
And it failed as a system because it is
cling to the system of "succession", which necessarily does not work
in modern society. Therefore the Sufism trend itself as an ideal system in the
leadership of the Muslim world for his belief to separate religion from
politics and to submit political theses for the transition to
"Secularization of the Islamic world."
Sufism was able to absorb secularism,
and as the same time, it is the Islamic manifestation that is capable of
carrying the system of democratic values.
Here
we have to distinguish between the Sufism ways. There are ways to keep up with
the developments of the modern era, and push symbols in the public work, while
there are other methods immersed in popular folklore, and isolated from the
public life and practices.
The importance of the study stems from
the study of the political formation of the Sufis, the benefit of the large
number of its supporters, and the Sufism belief that religion should be in
isolation from political life.
In this study, we will focus on the Sufi
direction, as a movement through which an ideal model of Islam can be presented
for the qualities in which the political process can be imbued with liberal
values.
Firstly: the political employment of the
Sufi direction:
There is a set of transformations that
have been inserted into the sufism based on the alienation from public life and
asceticism in worldly affairs.
The majority of the Sufi movements tend
to adopt non-dynamic principles and ideas that are contrary to human nature and
are incompatible with the issue of human fragmentation through the principle of
asceticism.
But there are trends within Sufism to
integrate them into public work, or to employ them to serve the political
process, which we can call politicization of the Sufis.
Political employment is an attempt to
integrate a particular direction that was not political, to engage in the
political process and to start taking all the political mechanisms to empower
itself.
These include participation in political
action and the establishment of political parties, or participate in it.
- Political formation of Sufism:
The political formation is the process
of educating the citizen the political principles and mechanisms. As well as
"Sufism" as a process for the formation of the individual to approach
God and retire public life. Nor does it play a role in serving the good for the
society, which is one of the essential benefits that an individual can offer to
society and to God.
Here the Sufi tendency can be combined
with engagement within society (political action) since serious action on both
sides is brought closer to God.
But there are a set of determinants that
correspond to the integration of Sufis entering the concerns of public
life:
The determinant of Sufi thought: The
Sufi mind tends to the principles of the social nature of the human nature and
is incompatible with the issue of fragmentation in the earth and the
architecture of the universe.
The societal determinant: Most Sufi
methods are to abandon the communal roles and infiltrate into the affairs of
the society and integrate them. It also prefer to work on the outskirts of
cities and villages away from urban communities, which reduces their
interaction within the political action.
Sufi formation: The Sufism methods are
based on the absolute obedience of the Sheikh of the Sufi method, and the
validation of all his sayings and opinions.
Apparently, political action and the
Sufi direction are contradictory. The political process is a dynamic social process,
and the Sufi individual is self-reliant away from life issues. And because
political formation is all factors affecting the citizen whether these factors
are directly related to political work or indirectly.
Therefore, the way is the most important
environment for the education of the sufi individual, some of the political
concepts and terms, which are necessarily not separated from the principles of
Sufism and the principles of the Islamic religion. In addition to spiritual
isolation and closeness to God, it is necessary to do the things for the people
you are responsible for.
Secondly: Liberal determinants of Sufi
Empowerment
Sufism
tends to distance from the world, while other Islamist movements seek to link
the world with the hereafter, and the need for society to follow the same
principles and way of life in the early days of Islam. As if Islam was created
to guide man in a monolithic way of life. Cohabitation did not develop living
patterns as they change over the ages.
The Middle Ages in Europe, the Umayyad
and Abbasid periods in the history of Islamic civilization; all are examples
that the fusion of politics and religion is to harness religion to the
interests of rulers and kings.
The end of the Middle Ages in Europe was
the first start of the need to separate religion from politics in Europe, after
dark ages. And that the formation of the state is based on the concept of
nationalism and the exercise of religious rites within the church, and then
Europe began to devote the efforts of its scientists to progress in preparation
for the scientific revolution in the eighteenth century.
In the course of the Islamic caliphate
it is a policy that distorted religion and systems, then worked to adapt the
religion to serve its goals and interests and retain the rule for them and
their children.
Therefore, we find that the relationship
between religion and politics causes a sedition. Such as, what happened during
the Islamic caliphates beginning from the death of the Prophet peace be upon
him.This was manifested in the great strife after the death of Uthman ibn Affan
and the Muslims fighting each other.
The integration of religion into
politics in Europe entered it in the dark ages, and Europe was progressed only
when it confined religion within the church and restricted the church and pope
power. As well as, gave each nation the freedom to choose the system of
government it wanted in accordance with its interests.
The most important reasons for
secularism (means separation of religion from all walks of life), emergence is
facing the power of the priests of the Church in Europe after their
interference in everything.
Following the Arab Spring, Islamist
movements (the Muslim Brotherhood, the Salafists) seized parliamentary and
presidential elections. But they quickly failed due to their adherence to the
concept of the Islamic caliphate and to the restoration of the living
conditions of the Prophet Muhammad and his companions fourteen centuries ago.
The
problem arose between an Islamist movement that failed to lead the transitional
phase and a secular model rejected by the society for not taking into account
the Islamic and Arab privacy of its citizens.
Therefore, the Sufi trend was manifested
as an Islamic trend that believes in Islamic principles and avoids engaging in
public life altogether.
The following is a link between Sufi
thought and liberal integration within the process of political employment, and
the implications of liberal parties adopting the Sufi direction as follows:
- Facing the Islamic organizations of
the Islamic movement in an anti-Islamic tone. That tone calls for those
movements of the application of the principles of the principles of Islamic law
and the system of succession, and other principles of such organizations.
Which differ with the tendencies of the
principles of democracy and liberalism in the need to separate religion from
the state. On the grounds that Sufism does not differ in its political
principles of separation of religion from the state, and take a negative situation
on the application of Islamic law.
- Encourage the integration of Sufi
values with
the values of
civil society in different educational stages, especially the basic stages that
represent the basic formation of the citizen. In addition to reviving the sufi
culture and arts.
- The coalition of liberal parties with
Sufism can be deployed in facing of
Islamist movements, especially confronting terrorist organizations, and
the response to their violent beliefs through Islamic law will have a profound
impact.
- After the failure of dynamic Islam in
the Arab region, the Sufi trend has become the destination of dissidents and
those who separated from other groups. In addition to the accession of large
numbers of the sect who were part of the islamists streams. Which provides
momentum and a popular background to confront the dynamic Islam through which
it can gain reasonable votes in the parliamentary elections.
- The secular movement (liberal)
characterised by pluralism and freedom, and that the interpretation of Sharia
and Islamic law is a flexible interpretation of many conflicting tendencies.
Therefore the application of Sharia represents a unified view and perception of
groups and parties of Islamist movements.
And that everyone has the freedom to
embrace their religion, and that the national community is a fabric that
combines contradictions in a single framework that governs all under one
nationality.
And therefore it completely rejects the
principle of asceticism advocated by Islamist streams. It is a principle that
is consistent with what Sufis go to.
- Islam, in its various doctrines and
laws, its main place is in the heart of man, and does not exceed the limits of
the mosque. If it tries to enter into politics, power and governance, it will
distort religion and paint it with political variables.
-The integration of the Copts with the
Sufis in one system to confront the Islamists on the pretext of establishing
the foundations of national unity between the sectors of the people (Muslims
and Christians). Addressing extremist ideology and emphasizing the state's
civilization, and expelling the superiority and inferiority that it adopts for
Islamists movements.
Thirdly: Political practice of the Sufi stream
after the Arab Spring
The post-Arab movement and the rise of
Islamist streams leading the Arab political scene, revealed the marginal role
played by the Sufi stream because of the crisis of Sufi thought and its closure
of political life.
Most of the Sufi methods have become a
political tool in the hands of the ruling regimes in the Arab region, whether
the countries that have experienced revolutions and popular uprisings or those
who have not.
In contrast to the silent attitude of
some methods towards the Arab revolutions, others have tended to issue
statements and slogans supporting the popular uprising.
The
Sufi movement in Egypt took a clear situation towards the revolution, as some
of these methods participated in the Egyptian revolution. It is worth
mentioning here that what these movements called for to emphasize the
"civil state of Egypt" through many of its statements and political
mobilization for what it called at that time a group "in love of
Egypt" to highlight the political principle that believes in "
Religion of the state. And opposed other Islamic streams (the Muslim
Brotherhood, the Salafist Group, the Islamic Group) from the need to establish
the Islamic caliphate.
However, the Sufi role in the political
process following the Arab Spring during the 2012 parliamentary elections (the
Brotherhood and the Salafi group won the majority of the seats in the House and
Shura Council) has been marginal or failure due to the fragmentation of the
Sufi movement in several directions. One sees the necessity of participation
and confronting other Islamist streams. And the lack of agreement on a single
list of Sufi youth, as well as the preference of some individuals to support
other liberal political parties in the election campaign.
- common denominators between the Sufi
and liberal streams.
In spite of the marginal role of the
Sufi during the Arab Spring, it resulted from what was mentioned earlier, the
existence of common ground between the Sufi and liberal current, for their
belief in the need to separate religion from the state and work against other
Islamist currents. That take the system of the Islamic Caliphate as a basic
principle of governance in the region Arabic, and the principle of
classification among members of society and the preference of the individual
belonging to it to others.
The main danger of these ideologies is
the "mechanisms of change by violence." The political opposition of
these groups is characterized by murder or atonement, and the resultant
establishment of a wide network of extremist groups in the Arab region that
transformed them into anarchy. That threatened to form states in the region, it even has reached the threat of Western
countries.
After the failure of the Islamic movements in
the transitional period, a number of voices within the scientific and research
circles, called for the search for a moderate Islamic alternative. The Sufi
trend was an ideal alternative due to its distinctiveness from other streams
with the peaceful means of the opposition, the acceptance of the other,
rejection of the Islamic caliphate principle.
In order to support this trend towards
the development of the Sufi role, it is necessary to encourage Sufism to play a
role within the political corridors. To disseminate information tools to
disseminate their ideas and their interaction within the society. The necessity
of activating the role of Sufi methods across the Arab region.
Conclusion: Sufism is the future of the
Islamic streams
After explaining politics in the Sufi
direction and turning to this direction from the background of ideology. One of
its basic principles is the spiritual preoccupation with the moral reform of
the soul, the self-liberation of the soul, and thus it is the gateway to the
secularization of the Islamic world.
The ruling regimes in the Islamic world
are begging Sufism to fight the politicized Islamic phenomenon, which enticed
the West to adopt the same method. The German orientalist Stephan Reichmut even
goes so far as to say that the future of the Muslim world will inevitably be
the Sufi stream.
Recently, Western countries aspired to
find an alternative to the radical Islamist trend. A number of research
centers, after the events of September 2001, ignited the need to block radical
streams through several strategies, including support for liberal currents that
are an extension of Western culture. And support traditional religious groups
represented in Sufi methods. The West seeks through Sufism to adopt its idea of
separating religion
from the state and the religious arena in the Sufi current as an alternative to
the Salafist and Muslim groups, and supported a number of international
conferences to spread Sufi thought in the Arab world, including the conference
"Sufism is an Authentic Approach to Reform" "Together to
Activate the Role of Sufi Roads in Africa", 2005.
"The Sufi stream, by focusing on
common Islamic principles, can become a deterrent to other streams of Islam," says Farina Alam, a Sufi
representative in Europe.