Issued by CEMO Center - Paris
ad a b
ad ad ad

Trembling on the rope of politics: Mullahs and Britain between the white list and the black swirl

Friday 29/November/2019 - 02:59 PM
The Reference
Nora Bandari
طباعة

In light of the campaign launched by the mullahs' regime against Iranian journalists and the Iranian media opposing it, especially those that display the repressive means committed by this regime against its people, in addition to exposing its acts of corruption as well, and therefore the British Journalists Syndicate demanded in a statement 26 November 2019 that Iranian government halts the harassment of employees of Iran International and the BBC.

 

The terror of the mullahs

 

According to a statement published by the website Iran International, the British Syndicate confirmed that in recent days, Iranian officials threatened journalists working for both Iran International and the BBC in Farsi, and their family members were threatened and harassed.

 

The British union said that the Iranian intelligence summoned the relatives of some journalists from Iran International and told them that the staff of the site would be at risk of forcible return from Britain to Iran, if they did not resign from the channel.

 

The statement noted that the Iranian security authorities want to suggest that Independent media outside Iran are behind the recent protests, prompting them to take these arbitrary measures against journalists opposed to them.

 

In this context, the Secretary General of the British Journalists Syndicate Michel Stein Street highlighted the threats of the Iranian regime of journalists, indicating that the Iranian regime has used harsh methods to threaten and terrorize journalists in Britain and around the world.

 

He stressed that the syndicate and all those determined to support media freedom will do their utmost to prevent the Iranian government from imposing silence on journalists.

 

Fear of the media

 

The British union's statement comes in response to the official complaint filed by the Iranian embassy in London to the British Communications Office on Saturday, November 23, 2019, demanding the closure of Persian-language television channels in the UK because of its call for what the embassy described as violence against civil institutions, and misrepresentations of recent events.

 

What happens on the part of the mullahs' regime against the free and independent media confirms that this system fears this media, which exposes its crimes, violations and repressive methods against its people.

 

The suppression of the mullahs against the media is not limited to the Iranian media but it has led to the closure of the foreign media so that the Iranian people do not know the crimes committed by their regime, and so that these means do not display the secret of this regime.

 

Therefore, on November 26, 2019, the Iranian government developed a so-called “white list”, which includes sites that are allowed to be accessed and used by governmental organizations and private companies.

 

Iranian violations and British responses

 

In a statement to the Reference, Ahmad Qabal, a researcher on Iranian affairs at the Al-Ahram Center for Political and Strategic Studies, said that in light of the repression and tyranny that the mullahs system deliberately practices against the Iranian people, this system is misleading the media on Iranian and international media platforms, through anti-corruption slogans , either by exerting pressure on staff or influencing them through a network of Iranian agents.

 

Qabal pointed out that Britain, as one of the Western countries supporting the Iranian opposition, was a key party in confronting these Iranian actions.

 

Therefore, the British newspapers have condemned the days of the Iranian authorities cutting the Internet service, denouncing the human rights violations and the oppression against the Iranian protesters.

 

The British are one of the open gates; to convey the reality of events inside the Iranian street; which irritated the Iranian regime and pushed for more confusion, especially as Britain in terms of freedoms and human rights has a prestigious international status and a strong impact on public opinion.

"