Easing of lockdown a relief to Ghana’s poor – despite fears it is premature
Since the sudden easing of a three-week lockdown in
Ghana’s two major cities, Accra and Kumasi, daily life is gradually returning
to normal.
Markets and commercial districts that had ground to
an eerie halt have buzzed back to life. Stores and banks have slowly reopened.
Modest traffic jams have emerged as many people who had escaped the lockdown
return to the cities. But schools, places of worship, restaurants and bars
remain shut.
The reaction to President Nana Akufo-Addo’s
unexpected order to ease restrictions two weeks ago has been mixed.
Among the west African country’s corporate workers
and affluent classes, many people continue to work from home and fear that the
easing of the lockdown is premature.
From his apartment in Accra’s affluent East Legon,
30-year-old Delvin Cooper, who works for digital creation firm Pulse Ghana,
worries that the severity of the coronavirus outbreak has not fully registered
in the country.
“The government should have waited at least a little
bit longer,” he said. “People still haven’t got the actual understanding of
what the situation is.”
However, for millions of people living on the edge,
working in Ghana’s largely informal economy, each day of the lockdown deepened
their worries.
Outside a small factory in a quiet neighbourhood in
northern Accra, Raphael Awitor, who is in his 40s, stirs sand and cement with a
shovel. Toiling in the blazing sun, he races to make as many bricks as
possible. On good days he can earn 80 cedis (£11).
“I planned to come to work on Monday whether or not
the lockdown was lifted,” Raphael said. “We were really hungry.”
He had become desperate after quickly spending his
savings of just 300 cedis.
Ghana’s government has halved electricity costs and
cancelled water bills for three months, and distributed food supplies to ease
the effects of the lockdown. But the help has not reached everyone, Raphael
laments. “I didn’t even see the trucks that were sharing it.”
Nearby, Nyamekye Agyemang, 55, sets her steel pots
containing wraps of fufu, banku and a mix of stews on small stools in a wooden
kiosk, waiting for custom from construction workers and passers-by. Food
vendors were permitted to work during the lockdown but the impact on her income
from reduced footfall was immense.
People wait to receive food and water from
volunteers in Accra during the partial lockdown on 4 April. Photograph: Francis
Kokoroko/Reuters
Since the lockdown was eased, however, confirmed
Covid-19 cases have doubled to more than 2,000. The number of deaths stands at
17.
The government has defended its decision, arguing
that the country’s early lockdown allowed it to assess Ghana’s needs, and that
it bought the authorities time to boost health infrastructure, testing
capacity, and pinpoint where the outbreaks were.
In his speech announcing an easing of the lockdown,
the president promised to improve testing. “We are ranked number one in Africa
in the administering of tests per million people,” he said.
The government said it was starting the largest
investment in the country’s healthcare, with 96 new hospitals planned for the
next year and improved services.
Ghana’s information minister, Kojo Nkrumah, told the
Guardian the lockdown had helped the government to assess its health systems
and what the country would need, based on increased data collection from
Covid-19 tests.
“We decided not to wait but to do a precautionary
lockdown early and within that period get mass findings and data to help us,”
he said. About 110,000 tests were administered.
The government has increased its supply of
ventilators, said Nkrumah, to around 200. Among the first 1,200 patients fewer
than five required intensive care or ventilation.
According to Nkrumah, the length and function of
lockdowns had to be decided by individual countries. “We should guard against
assuming that there is a one size fits all approach. You should let the local
context be applied when enforcing these lockdowns,” he said.
But pressure to ease the restrictions was mounting
before the president made the decision. Ghana’s powerful Trade Union Congress
had pressed Addo to adopt a different strategy.
“Nearly 90% of Ghanaians work in the informal
economy,” the secretary general, Anthony Baah, told the Guardian. “In a
lockdown the impact can become unbearable, so we are happy with what the
government has done.”
And just days after the lockdown was imposed at the
end of March, pockets of demonstrations broke out in Ghana.
Traders protesting in a market in Kasoa, western
Accra, said they knew the lockdown was needed to curb the spread of the virus but
they were not in a position to survive it. “The president’s directive is good
but it won’t help us,” said one.
The mass outcry so early on during the lockdown was
a worry for the government, particularly in what is supposed to be an election
year.
Many fear the government has been too hasty. Seizing
the moment, former president John Mahama sparked the sparked the criticism in a
tweet before Addo’s announcement. “Concerns persist that the government has
taken a gamble,” he said. “Many health experts continue to suggest the
necessity and appropriateness of an extension of the restrictions.”