Afghan president names council for peace deal with Taliban
Afghanistan’s president has appointed a council for
national reconciliation, which will have final say on whether the government
will sign a peace deal with the Taliban after what are expected to be
protracted and uncertain negotiations with the insurgents.
The negotiations were envisaged under a U.S.-Taliban
peace agreement signed in February as intra-Afghan talks to decide the war-torn
country’s future. However, their start has been hampered by a series of delays
that have frustrated Washington. Some had expected the negotiations to begin
earlier this month.
Afghan President Ashraf Ghani issued a decree late
Saturday establishing the 46-member council, led by his former rival in last
year’s presidential election, Abdullah Abdullah, who is now in the government.
The council is separate from a 21-member negotiating
team, which Ghani appointed in March and which is expected to travel to the
Gulf Arab state of Qatar, where the Taliban maintain a political office, for
intra-Afghan talks.
The council will have the final say and will
ultimately decide on the points that the negotiating team takes up with the
Taliban.
Abdullah’s appointment to head the reconciliation
efforts followed a power-sharing deal he signed in May with Ghani to end the
political deadlock after last year’s election — a vote in which Abdullah had
also declared himself a winner.
The High Council for National Reconciliation is made
up of an array of Afghan political figures, including current and former
officials, and nine women representatives, one of whom was named Abdullah’s
deputy. Ghani also appointed former President Hamid Karzai to the council but
his predecessor rejected the appointment in a statement Sunday, saying he
declines to be part of any government structure.
Also on the council are mujahedeen and jihadi
leaders who fought against the Soviet Union in the 1980s but who were also
involved in a Afghanistan’s brutal civil war that followed their takeover in
1992 that left 50,000, mostly civilians, dead in Kabul. Among them is Gulbuddin
Hekmatyar, who signed a peace deal with Ghani in 2016 but previously was
declared a terrorist by the U.S.
The council also includes Abdur Rasool Sayyaf, who
was the inspiration for the Philippine terrorist group Abu Sayyaf. During the
1992-1996 civil war, Sayyaf’s fighters killed thousands of minority Shiite
Muslims led by a rival warlord.
However, the establishment of the council may not
sit well with the Taliban, who have appointed just one 20-member negotiating
team that has the authority to make final decisions. The Taliban team answers
only to the insurgents’ leader, Mullah Hibatullah Akhunzada.
There are also other obstacles in the way of the
negotiations. The Afghan government has reversed a decision to release the last
320 Taliban prisoners it is holding until the insurgents free more captured
soldiers.
The U.S.-Taliban deal called on the Taliban to free
1,000 government and military personnel they hold captive while the government
was to free 5,000 Taliban prisoners, in an exchange meant as a goodwill gesture
ahead of the intra-Afghan negotiations.
The government appears adamant to secure freedom for
the soldiers. Javid Faisal, spokesman for the National Security Advisor’s
office, tweeted there are no changes to the plan.
“The Taliban will have to release our commandos held
by them before the government resumes the release of the remaining 320 Taliban
prisoners,” he said.
The U.S.-Taliban deal is aimed at ending America’s
war in Afghanistan — a conflict that began shortly after the Sept. 11 attacks
and toppled the Taliban regime, which had harbored al-Qaida leader Osama bin
Laden.
U.S. troops have already started leaving
Afghanistan, and by November, fewer than 5,000 troops are expected to still be
in the country. That’s down from nearly 13,000 when the U.S.-Taliban agreement
was signed Feb. 29.
Under the agreement, the withdrawal of U.S. troops
does not hinge on the success of intra-Afghan talks but on commitments made by
the Taliban to combat terrorist groups and ensure Afghanistan is not used as a
staging ground for attacks on the U.S. and its allies.
Since signing the agreement, the Taliban have held
to a promise not to attack U.S. and NATO troops, but have carried out regular
attacks on Afghan security forces. The government wants an immediate
cease-fire, while the Taliban have said the terms should be agreed in the
negotiations.
Attacks, however, have continued unabated, with
civilians bearing the brunt of the violence.
On Friday, roadside bombs struck vehicles carrying
civilians in separate attacks in southern Afghanistan, killing 14 people,
including three children. No one has so far claimed responsibility for those
bombings.
Earlier last week, attacks — including a Taliban
truck bombing in northern Balkh province that targeted a commando base for
Afghan forces — left at least 17 people dead and scores more wounded.



