The death of Al Qaeda leader in Qatar
 
 
Rita Katz, the director of SITE Intelligence Group
tweeted about “rumors that are yet to be verified regarding the death of Al
Qaida’s leader in Qatar” about a month ago. 
However, Qatari Government officials still haven’t
confirmed this news. There are a number of unconfirmed reports circulating that
Ayman al-Zawahiri, who served as the leader of al-Qaeda since the death of
Usamah Bin Laden, passed away of illness about a month ago but al-Qaeda group
and the Qatar government haven’t confirmed this news so far.
The fact that there are no statements released about
the reality of this news from the al-Qaeda group and nor the Qatar government
and also that the whereabouts of Ayman al-Zawahiri is not clear, is a very
complex issue to analyze. Considering the history of Qatar’s support for the
al-Qaeda group, one can say: Qatar is liquidating Ayman al-Zawahiri in order to
preserve the disclosure of the many secrets between Qatar and Al-Qaeda. It
would be surprising if Qatar were covering-up his death if he really is dead.
It is very typical of both Qatar and the al-Qaeda
group to not publish news and confirmations about the death of its leaders in
an appropriate manner.
For instance, the group never confirmed the death of
Hamza bin Laden. When Adam Gadahn (AKA Azzam the American) died in 2015, it
took the group five months to acknowledge his death. Even the death of Osama
bin Laden, if it wasn’t for the US, his death might have been kept hidden for a
long period of time by the Qatar government and al-Qaeda.
This issue is important for Afghanistan and it’s
fight with the Taliban and al-Qaeda. If his death is true then, this is good
news for Afghanistan, especially with the intra-Afghan peace talks moving
forward. Because, Al-Zawahiri also had close ties with the Taliban in
Afghanistan, one of his most significant strategic victories was that he had
managed to preserve al Qaida's relationship with the Afghan Taliban, which has
survived despite enormous international and U.S. military pressure to cut ties.
 The
United Nations recently reported that in recent months, Zawahiri personally
negotiated with senior Afghan Taliban leadership to obtain assurances of
continued support. These talks appear to have been successful; despite
commitments to the U.S. government as part of the February 2020 Doha peace
deal, the Afghan Taliban has neither publicly renounced al Qaida nor taken any
apparent action to limit the group's operations in Afghanistan.
Senior Taliban sources repeatedly claimed that state
funding from Qatari authorities started funding them in 2006. The same applies
to al-Qaeda group. Although it is still uncertain in comparison to the level
reached by funding in later years, at this point external funding (Qatari and
Pakistani) consisted (according to sources in the Taliban’s financial
structure) of several tens of millions of dollars, allowing for the insurgency
to expand inside Afghanistan. Thus, in 2006, the size of the Taliban insurgency
groups started growing at a much bigger scale than the past. These donors of
the Taliban group were only sponsoring the Taliban groups in Afghanistan and
they refused to support other groups like Hizb-I Islami, which belongs to
Gulbuddin Hekmatyar. One of the only ways that other groups like Hizb-I Islami
could access the funding was to join the Taliban and only then they could have
access to funding. It seems like a smart way to expand the group of
fundamentalists through which later Qatar maybe make it easier to have ground
in Afghanistan.
Moreover, the Al-Qaeda group will be facing many
serious challenges moving forward once the death of their leader Ayman
al-Zawahiri is confirmed. For one, there's the question of who will lead al
Qaida after Zawahiri's gone? Much like the generation before it, the next AQ
leader’s successor will face the dilemma of balancing what many in al Qaida
believe is the imperative of transnational terrorism in the West and the costs
of U.S. and U.S.-allied counterterrorism efforts.
 Many
leaders likely perceive a major attack as proving al Qaida's imprimatur as the
dominant jihadi movement, in service of bin Laden's grand strategy of baiting
and bleeding the United States in challenging confrontations.
 
          
     
                                
 
 


