EU tightens vaccine export rules, creates post-Brexit outcry

The European Union introduced tighter rules Friday on exports of COVID-19 vaccines that could hit shipments to nations like the United Kingdom, deepening a dispute with London over scarce supplies of potentially lifesaving shots.
But amid an outcry in Northern Ireland and the UK, the European
Commission made clear the new measure will not trigger controls on vaccines
shipments produced in the 27-nation bloc to the small territory that is part of
United Kingdom bordering EU member Ireland.
Under the post-Brexit deal, EU products should still be able to travel
unhindered from the bloc to Northern Ireland.
“In the process of finalization of
this measure, the Commission will ensure that the Ireland/Northern Ireland
Protocol is unaffected,” the EU’s executive arm said in a statement late Friday.
Amid a dispute with Anglo-Swedish drugmaker AstraZeneca, EU Commission
president Ursula von der Leyen and British leader Boris Johnson had an
unexpected phone call, during which the UK prime minister “expressed his grave
concerns about the potential impact which the steps the EU has taken today on
vaccine exports could have,” a statement from the British government read.
The EU unveiled its plans to tighten rules on exports of coronavirus
vaccines produced inside the bloc amid fears some of the doses it secured from
AstraZeneca could be diverted elsewhere. The measure could be used to block
shipments to many non-EU countries and ensure that any exporting company based
in the EU will first have to submit their plans to national authorities.
The UK and Northern Ireland governments immediately lashed out at the
move, saying the bloc invoked an emergency clause in its divorce deal with
Britain to introducing controls on exports to Northern Ireland. Goods are
supposed to flow freely between the EU and Northern Ireland under special
arrangements for the U.K. region designed to protect the peace process on the
island of Ireland.
But the EU later said it was not invoking Article 16 of the Northern
Ireland Protocol allowing either side to override parts of their deal.
“The Commission is not triggering
the safeguard clause,” it said in its statement, adding that the restricting
regulations have yet to be finalized and won’t be adopted before Saturday.
The phone call between von der Leyen and Johnson somewhat eased what was
quickly becoming a diplomatic flashpoint.
“We agreed on the principle that
there should not be restrictions on the export of vaccines by companies where
they are fulfilling contractual responsibilities,” von der Leyen said in a
statement.
The EU hit out at AstraZeneca this week after the company said it would
only supply 31 million doses of vaccine in initial shipments, instead of the 80
million doses it had hoped to deliver. Brussels claimed AstraZeneca would
supply even less than that, just one-quarter of the doses due between January
and March — and member countries began to complain.
The European Commission is concerned that doses meant for Europe might
have been diverted from an AstraZeneca plant on the continent to the U.K., where
two other company sites are located. The EU also wants doses at two sites in
Britain to be made available to European citizens.
“The UK has legally-binding
agreements with vaccine suppliers and it would not expect the EU, as a friend
and ally, to do anything to disrupt the fulfilment of these contracts,” the UK
said.
AstraZeneca CEO Pascal Soriot told Germany’s Die Welt newspaper this
week that the U.K. government helped create the vaccine developed with Oxford
University and signed its contract three months before the EU did. Soriot said
that under the British contract, vaccines produced at U.K. sites must go to the
U.K. first.
To head off similar disputes and allay fears that vaccines might be
diverted, the Commission introduced the measures to tighten rules on the
exports of shots produced in EU countries. The “vaccine export transparency
mechanism″ will be used at least until the end of March to control shipments to
non-EU countries.
The EU insisted that’s not an export ban, although it could be used to
block shipments to the UK or many other non-EU countries. Many poorer nations
and close neighbors are exempt.
Officials said it is intended to ensure EU member nations get the shots
they bought from producers. The World Health Organization criticized the new EU
export rules as “not helpful.”
Director General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus and other WHO officials
warned of supply-chain disruptions that could ripple through the world and
potentially stall the fight against COVID-19.
The “advanced purchasing agreement” with the EU was signed in August,
before the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine had been properly tested. The European
Medicines Agency approved the vaccine on Friday, making it the third authorized
for use by EU nations.
Earlier, the 27-nation bloc and AstraZeneca made public a heavily
redacted version of their vaccine deal that’s at the heart of a dispute over
the delivery schedule.
The contract, agreed to last year by the European Commission and the
drugmaker, allows the EU’s member countries to buy 300 million doses of the
AstraZeneca vaccine, with an option for a further 100 million doses. It’s one
of several contracts the EU’s executive branch has with vaccine makers to
secure a total of more than 2 billion shots.
As part of an “advanced purchase agreement” with companies, the EU said
it has invested 2.7 billion euros ($3.8 billion), including 336 million ($408
million) to finance the production of AstraZeneca’s serum at four factories.
Much of the 41-page document made public was blacked out, making it very difficult to establish which side is in the right. Details about the price of the vaccine were notably redacted. The U.K. is thought to be paying far more for the vaccine than EU countries.