Ali: Anti-Egypt campaign in the name of human rights serving the interests of the Muslim Brotherhood

Claims about violations
mere Brotherhood lies that are bankrolled by suspicious groups
Defending human rights is
the foundational value of the West during the post-period. This is one of the
philosophical foundations of the Age of Enlightenment and the French
Revolution, which launched the famous Declaration of Human Rights and
Citizenship in 1789.
However, this noble
concept is often overused, and sometimes even distorted by a number of
movements and actors whose real agenda has nothing to do with human rights'
values. They seek to achieve subversive political goals under this pretext.
The best example of this
unfortunate exploitation is what is happening now in France and elsewhere in
the West. Many anti-Western leftist organizations, who call themselves
"Islamist leftists", are constantly attacking regimes in Arab
countries like Egypt which stands on the front line of the fight the extremist
Muslim Brotherhood organization.
This organization is the
ideological source and the main engine of terrorism, now rampant everywhere
because of what came to be known as the "Arab Spring".
Brotherhood lie
We all know that the term
"human rights" is used systematically by the Muslim Brotherhood,
which is leading an intense campaign from Europe and Qatar, as well as the
circles of American democracy and Turkey to demonize the Egyptian state and
incite international and Western public opinion against it.
As an Egyptian citizen
and expert specializing in the affairs of Islamic movements, including the
Muslim Brotherhood and jihadist movements in general, and also believing in the
need to defend secularism, I cannot help but confirm that the campaigns launched
by these groups only benefit militants and terrorists.
In fact, those who wage
these campaigns against Cairo are contributing, willingly or unwillingly, to
slowing down Egypt's efforts on the path to fighting terrorism. They seek in
various ways to obscure the role this country plays to restore security and
stability regionally and internationally.
It is strange that many
organizations in the West get their knowledge about the human rights situation
in Egypt from Brotherhood operatives, now in Western countries after fleeing
their home country. The same operatives were sentenced in Egypt for their
involvement in killing and bloodshed and attacks on state facilities since
2013. Attacks by the same operatives claimed the lives of hundreds of innocent
people. They also attacked mosques, churches, and security and military
installations.
False human rights
defenders attacked Egypt and its president, Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, just when no
place in Egypt was spare from terrorist attacks. Terrorists staged more than
1,000 operations that left more than 4,000 people dead, including army
personnel, policemen, and civilians.
This is the method the
Brotherhood leaders, including their supreme guide, always use. Incumbent
supreme guide Ibrahim Moneer uses London as a launch pad for his operations.
This European capital has become a safe haven for the International
Organization of the Muslim Brotherhood.
This organization uses
other European capitals to disseminate false information to human rights
activists and the far-left, known as "Islamic left". The same
activists use the information given them by the organization in addressing the
media and the European Parliament.
Egypt has come a long way
in fighting terrorism. Europe should have helped it, instead of obstructing its
efforts to eradicate terrorism.
Unfortunately, Europe and
its activists often forget that period, when they attacked Egypt. This country
had seen two great revolutions. After the first one the Muslim Brotherhood
hijacked the country. The one opened the door for the arrival to power by Abdel
Fattah al-Sisi in June 2014. This happened after more than 30 million people,
terrified and terrorized by the Muslim Brotherhood, asked the army to intervene
and sack Muslim Brotherhood president Mohamed Morsi who wanted to turn Egypt
into a militant theocracy.
Sisi was subsequently
elected by an overwhelming majority. This was a time when the Egyptian economy
was on the brink of collapse, the society was in chaos, and terrorism
everywhere on the streets of the Egyptian capital.
During that period,
terrorist organizations backed by the Muslim Brotherhood attacked state
institutions, private properties and houses of worship. The attacks also
happened against moderate mosques that were not controlled by the Brotherhood.
Hundreds of people were victimized in these attacks.
Egypt's complete
rebuilding was necessary to restore discipline to the streets and pull the
country out of the economic and financial hardships it was suffering from.
This was why the
parliament elected in October of 2015 passed laws that partially limited some
political rights, including the right to stage protests. The emergency law was
reinstituted because of the ongoing war on terrorism.
The constitutions of
well-established Western democracies stipulate the use of the state of
emergency when necessary. This is important for governments to confront dangers
to society. Egypt did this.
I want to ask the members
of the European Parliament who voted last November in favor of a resolution
against Egypt: What would they do if Egypt collapsed and became like Libya, now
an abandoned geopolitical black hole where terrorists, mafias and traffickers
have a free hand?
What will have remained
of human rights and citizenship rights if this country became bankrupt
completely or turned into another version of the African Sahel countries after
the downfall of the Muammar Gaddafi regime in Libya?
The African Sahel has
become a new epicenter of terrorism in the African continent Gaddafi, which
became a center of terrorism in Africa.
What will happen to world
peace if terrorism was allowed to strike the region by hitting in the most
populated regional state? What will happen to Europe if the influence of Recep
Tayyip Erdogan, the godfather of the Muslim Brotherhood, terrorists and ISIS,
became unrivalled in Libya? What will happen now if Egypt is in a state of
general weakness or is unable to challenge Erdogan's ambitions in Libya? By
acting to trim Erdogan's ambitions in Libya, Egypt is protecting itself, fellow
Arab states and Europe. It is protecting everybody against new Ottoman
imperialism and the imperialism of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Do the human rights
organizations defending the Muslim Brotherhood know the reality of this group?
I want to ask another
question to some "progressives" and Western human rights activists
who defend Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have been imprisoned in Egypt
since 2013 on the background of terrorism cases.
These people describe
these operatives as "political detainees" under the pretext that the
Brotherhood has established a political party, namely the Freedom and Justice
Party whose candidate won the 2012 presidential elections.
Do they know that
Abdullah Azzam, the founder of al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden's teacher, was one
of the leaders of the Muslim Brotherhood?
Do they know that Sayed
Qotb, the prime Muslim Brotherhood theoretician and the inventor of its ideology,
is the godfather of all terrorist organizations and the main reference for the
theorists of al-Qaeda, ISIS and even Ayatollah Khomeini?
Youssef al-Qaradawi, a
Muslim Brotherhood prominent figure and the co-founder of most official Muslim
Brotherhood associations in Europe, is responsible for hundreds of edicts that
approve suicide attacks against Europeans, Americans, Jews, Christians, Arab
nationalists and secular leaders under the pretext that all of them are
infidels?
He orders European
Muslims not to integrate into those their societies, asking them to invade the
continent.
Do human rights
organizations that prefer peaceful means to violence understand the reality of
the Muslim Brotherhood? Do they really know that the Muslim Brotherhood view Adolf
Hitler, for example, as an icon? Do they know that the late mufti of Jerusalem,
Amin al-Husseini, was a disciple of Muslim Brotherhood founder, Hassan
al-Banna? Do they know that al-Husseini was collaborated with Nazi Germany and
Fascist Italy? Do they know that the Brotherhood welcomed him as a hero in
Cairo in 1945 when he escaped from his prison in France after being convicted
of crimes against humanity in the Anti-Nazi Court in Nuremberg?
To those who demand – in
vain – through calls and the resolutions of the European Parliament against
Egypt to impose an embargo on European arms to Cairo, I want to remind you that
we have many other challenges than confronting terrorism. We need to strengthen
police so that it can secure the country. We need to build the capabilities of
the army to face the challenges of increasing Turkish threats in the region.
A strong partner
In this global context,
Egypt strengthened its strategic partnership with France. It signed agreements
with Greece and Cyprus and also strengthened its partnership with France's
strong ally in the Gulf region, namely the United Arab Emirates, which has the
largest French military base.
On the other hand, the
elected Egyptian parliament d into law drafts to stimulate the reconstruction
of the country within the framework of Egypt's sustainable development
strategy.
The traditional concept
of human rights has evolved to include social and economic rights as basic
rights. Slums were eradicated and citizens were granted the right to adequate
housing. Hepatitis C was eradicated, health services improved, and education
modernized, which is necessary for the fight against extremism and terrorism.
Women and Christians were
given the right to adequate political representation.
State authorities also
implemented giant electricity projects, which are the main driver of the
development process. Thanks to these measures, women won, for the first time in
Egypt's history, 25% of the seats in parliament.
As for the Christians,
they won 31 seats, six times higher than the number of seats they won in the
previous parliaments.
Hidden agenda
We would have appreciated
it, if human rights defenders interested in what they call
"repression" and the defense of the Muslim Brotherhood terrorists
imprisoned since 2013 in connection with terrorist cases had mentioned all
these achievements.
We would have been
thankful if they had referred to the unprecedented progress made by Sisi. Sorry
to say, some of the associations that defend human rights receive dubious
financing. They tried to achieve other
goals, including the sabotage of economic and social reforms in Egypt by
calling for boycott campaigns and strikes in the country.
The same strategy was
followed against some other Arab countries that fight terrorism and stand
against the aspirations of the Muslim Brotherhood. It was launched against
France and its companies overseas.