Kenya withdraws from ICJ maritime border case with Somalia

Kenya has pulled out of the maritime border case with Somalia just a few hours to the scheduled hearing at the International Court of Justice in The Hague, Netherlands.
On March 9, the ICJ, a principal
judicial organ of the United Nations, stated it would hold public hearings in
the case concerning Maritime Delimitation in the Indian Ocean from tomorrow to
March 24.
Kenya is expected to file a notice
of non-participation in the hearings, sources say.
The Kenyan legal team may tomorrow
seek 30 minutes to explain grounds upon which the country may seek not to
participate in the hearings.
Kenya’s maritime area is
approximately 255,000km, which was determined through parallel of latitudes in
1979. Somalia recognised Kenya’s claim to the EEZ for 35 years.
However, in 2014, the Horn of
African country filed a case before the International Court of Justice. The
dispute was filed by Somalia’s Foreign Affairs and Investment Promotion
Minister, Abdirahman Dualeh, on August 28, 2014, on behalf of his government.
Point of disagreement
The point of disagreement between
Kenya and Somalia is the nature of the line of the maritime boundary.
Somalia asserts a centre line from
the Kenya/Somalia land boundary terminus but Kenya insists on a straight line.
Somalia’s central line carves out a triangle of the maritime area currently
occupied by Kenya and where four oil blocks are located.
In 2019, Somalia floated for
auction minerals within Kenya’s territorial waters alongside the four contested
oil blocks.
A document named ‘Offshore Somalia
2019’ and leaked from Somalia’s Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources
showed five oil blocks in Lamu are a part of those Somalia has floated to
investors.
Somalia floated for auction 15
blocks. They include blocks 131, 142, 152 and 153 located in Galmudug and
referred to as Obbia Basin, blocks 164, 165, 166, 177, 178 and 179 in
Hirshabelle referred to as Coriole Basin, and blocks 189, 190, 204, 218 and 219
located on the Lamu Basin, which is Kenya’s territorial waters.
The document detailed a plan, with
January 1, 2020 as the date the successful bidder would start exploration.
Last year, the Attorney-General
(AG) Kihara Kariuki (pictured) had asked for 12 months to prepare. ICJ instead
gave him until March this year to come up with a new legal team.
Last month, the AG again asked
that the court postpone the case in order to allow for a physical hearing, but
the court has insisted the hearing will proceed virtually.
The African Union had urged Kenya
and the Horn of Africa to consider negotiating the boundary dispute instead of
battling it out in court.
AU’s Peace and Security Council
invited both countries to give their side of the story. However, Somalia
rejected the offer and failed to appear during the first meeting, saying it
would not discuss a matter that was in court.
However, the country sent sent its Minister for Foreign Affairs Abdulkadir Ahmed-Kheir Abdi to the second meeting which did not bear fruit. If a solution can be found out of court, the better for the two countries.