Ethiopia Seeks Forcing a ‘Fait Accompli’ in Renaissance Dam Crisis

Ignoring calls and warnings from both Sudan and Egypt, Ethiopia reaffirmed it still had plans to move forward with the second phase of filling its Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam (GERD) when the rainy season begins in July.
Ethiopia’s
blind resolve to fill its hydropower project continues to baffle many,
especially after talks recently held in the Congolese capital, Kinshasa, having
failed in achieving any progress on re-launching negotiations on the filling
and operation of the GERD.
Addis
Ababa outright rejected concessions made by the two lower Nile Basin countries:
Egypt and Sudan. During the three-day talks in Kinshasa, Egypt had even tabled
a proposal that would have facilitated reaching a binding legal agreement
within eight weeks.
Nevertheless,
Ethiopian Water Minister Seleshi Bekele told a press conference that Ethiopia
would continue filling the dam's massive reservoir during the upcoming rainy
season, which normally begins in June or July.
“As construction progresses, filling
takes place,” Seleshi said, adding that his country will not “deviate” from its
plans to fill the dam.
Analysts
have suggested that Ethiopia’s tenacity means the country has adopted a
strategy focused on forcing a fait accompli in which the GERD is filled without
first acknowledging the national interests of Egypt and Sudan.
This
could push Cairo and Khartoum towards tough options like resorting to the UN
Security Council, seeking justice through international law, or even war.
Othman
Mirghani Al-Hussein, editor-in-chief of the Sudanese Al-Tayyar newspaper, has
argued that war cannot be ruled out given the growing tensions at borders with
Ethiopia.
Nevertheless,
chances of armed conflict breaking out remain very small, he noted, adding that
floating the idea of going to war can also be serving as a useful tactic for
influencing the course of dam negotiations.
Egyptian
President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, time and time again, had warned that all
options were on the table should Ethiopia take actions that adversely affect
his country’s share of Nile waters.
Sisi
even said that violating Egypt’s waters was a “red line” that would affect the
stability of the entire region.
“No one can take a drop of water from
Egypt,” the leader reaffirmed during a televised speech in March this year.
Sisi’s
stern warning was followed by units of Egyptian Air Force and commandos holding
war games with Sudanese troops.
The
Egyptian military said the drill, Nile Eagles-2, was held in northern Sudan and
had finished.
“The exercise aimed at achieving the
maximum use of participating assets in planning and executing air operations
and testing the readiness of the forces in carrying out joint operations
against targets,” the military said.
To
observers, the timing of the military drills means Egypt and Sudan could be
preparing for a war scenario.
But
for the time being, Sudanese Foreign Minister Mariam al-Sadiq al-Mahdi, during
a recent visit to Qatar, ruled out military action to stop Ethiopia from
filling the dam.
“There is no room to talk about the
military option. We are now talking about political options,” Mahdi told
reporters in Doha.
Similarly,
Ethiopian Prime Minister Abiy Ahmed previously dismissed resorting to armed
conflict by saying that his country did not want war with Sudan.
“Ethiopia also has many problems, and
we are not ready to go to battle. We don't need war. It is better to settle it
in a peaceful manner,” Abiy told parliament in remarks translated into English
for a live TV broadcast.
The
filling and operation of the GERD has been a source of tension in the Nile
River basin ever since Addis Ababa broke ground on it in 2011. Since then,
Egypt and fellow downstream nation Sudan have tried to persuade Ethiopia to
enter a legally binding agreement on the filling and operation of the dam.