UAE files WTO case against Qatar over goods ban

The Government of the United Arab Emirates announced
today that it has initiated World Trade Organisation, WTO, dispute-settlement
proceedings against Qatar following its ban of the sale of UAE products in
Qatari markets, said WAM news agency.
The move comes following the Qatari Ministry of
Economy's ban on the sale of consumer goods manufactured in the UAE, Saudi
Arabia, Bahrain and Egypt, as well as the decision of the country's Ministry of
Public Health to stop pharmacies from selling medicines and other products
coming from the four countries. Qatar has also removed the names of UAE
companies from the list of approved vendors for infrastructure projects and has
maintained an undeclared ban on products coming from the UAE.
The measures taken by Qatar are a flagrant violation
of WTO rules. Qatar took this action after its commencement to settle disputes
against the UAE through the WTO in August 2017, which is still an ongoing case.
However, rather than respecting the WTO to rule on its complaint, Qatar has
instead decided to impose unilateral retaliatory measures, violating the very
same rules it claims the UAE is violating.
WTO rules stipulate that members who claim that
another member has violated a WTO agreement must submit such claims to the
Dispute Settlement Body. The rules explicitly prohibit members from
unilaterally taking action in retaliation for alleged WTO violations. Yet that
is precisely what Qatar has done here. Having filed a WTO case, Qatar cannot
now disregard the rules of the WTO and impose retaliation on its own without a
WTO decision, WAM said.
As the UAE has made clear since the inception of
Qatar’s case, WTO rules specify that countries may take any action they
consider necessary to protect their fundamental security interests.
Qatar has tried to justify its decision by saying
that these actions were taken to protect the safety of consumers and to combat
the illegal trafficking of goods, but it offered no explanation as to why
consumer products from the four countries pose a consumer safety risk, and how
the products carry a risk of illegal trafficking.
The UAE’s termination of relations with Qatar is an
essential security action, not a trade one. Moreover, in its WTO complaint,
Qatar has neither alleged nor pointed to any aspect of such termination that
was designed to provide the UAE with a trade advantage. On the contrary,
Qatar’s unilateral retaliatory actions are pure trade actions designed to
discriminate against UAE goods, while local goods and other commodities coming
from other WTO members benefit from this action, WAM added.