London schoolgirl who fled to join Isis wants to return to UK
An east London schoolgirl who left the UK in 2015 to
join Islamic State has been tracked down in Syria where she said has no regrets
about joining the group, but now wants to come home as she is nine months
pregnant.
Shamima Begum, 19, said she fled the jihadists’ last
remaining enclave in Baghuz, eastern Syria, as she was tired of life on a
battlefield and feared for her unborn child after her two other children died.
“I was weak,” she told the Times from the al-Hawl
refugee camp in north-eastern Syria. “I could not endure the suffering and
hardship that staying on the battlefield involved. But I was also frightened
that the child I am about to give birth to would die like my other children if
I stayed on. So I fled the caliphate. Now all I want to do is come home to
Britain.”
She and two of her fellow Bethnal Green academy
pupils, Kadiza Sultana and Amira Abase, made headlines when they flew from
Gatwick to Turkey in February 2015, then entered Syria. Begum and Abase were
both 15, while Sultana was 16. They had told their parents they were simply
going out for the day.
The Guardian understands the Begum family believe
the woman identified in the Syrian camp is Shamima.
Begum told the Times she initially settled in Raqqa
where she married a Dutch convert after three weeks. She said life there
alternated between normality and atrocity, and added that the sight of a
“beheaded head” in a bin had not fazed her.
“Mostly it was a normal life in Raqqa, every now and
then bombing and stuff,” she said. “But when I saw my first severed head in a
bin it didn’t faze me at all. It was from a captured fighter seized on the
battlefield, an enemy of Islam.”
She said Sultana and Abase, along with another young
woman, Sharmeena Begum, also from Bethnal Green – who travelled to Syria two
months before the trio and is not a relative of Begum’s – had also married
foreign Isis fighters.
Sultana was reported to have died in 2016 in an
airstrike on Raqqa, and Begum confirmed this in the interview.
She gave a conflicting account of the so-called
caliphate. “There was so much oppression and corruption that I don’t think they
deserved victory,” she said. However, she added: “I don’t regret coming here.”
Begum said her family had moved down the Euphrates
valley as Isis retreated, eventually ending up in its final stronghold of
Baghuz. But after the deaths of her one-year-old daughter and three-month-old
son in recent months from illness and malnutrition she decided to flee.
She left Baghuz two weeks ago along a three-mile
long corridor east of Baghuz. Her husband surrendered to a group of Syrian
fighters allied to the Syrian Democratic Forces and she has not seen him since,
according to the Times.
She said Sharmeena Begum and Abase were believed to
have remained in Isis’s final stronghold. “I heard from other women only two
weeks ago that the two were still alive in Baghuz,” Shamima Begum said. “But
with all the bombing, I am not sure whether they have survived.
“They were strong … I respect their decision. They
urged patience and endurance in the caliphate and chose to stay behind in
Baghuz. They would be ashamed of me if they survived the bombing and battle to
learn that I had left.”
She added: “But I just want to come home to have my
child. That’s all I want right now. I’ll do anything required just to be able
to come home and live quietly with my child.”
The solicitor who represented Shamima Begum’s family
said she should be allowed to return to Britain and that counter-terrorism
officials should consider treating her as a victim.
Lawyer Tasnime Akunjee said: “I am really grateful
she is alive. Bernard Hogan-Howe when he was Metropolitan police commissioner
said the girls should be treated as victims as long as no evidence emerges that
they committed offences. I would hope that is honoured.
“She has suffered trauma and I hope that she can
come back and put this behind her. Anyone who has lost two children will need a
lot of help.”
The issue of Britons who fled to Isis-controlled
territory is a nightmare for the UK authorities. For those who were engaged in
fighting and terrorism, officials are clear they do not wish them to return.
However, the issue of their dependents and partners
is a trickier issue. Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism command is understood to
have examined whether Shamima Begum engaged in activity that makes her a danger
to British national security or would constitute an offence that she could be
charged with in the UK.
Shamima Begum’s emergence, pregnant with her third
child, poses a dilemma for the Foreign Office first as to whether she could be
offered consular assistance, and possibly helped out of the camp the Times
found her in.
Ultimately the home secretary, Sajid Javid, would
decide whether she should be allowed back to the UK, were Begum free to do so.
MI5 and MI6, the British intelligence agencies, as
well as counter-terrorism police, will assess what danger she may pose given
her decision to chose to leave the UK and to join Isis.