UN agency declares global emergency over virus from China
The World Health Organization declared the outbreak
sparked by a new virus in China that has spread to more than a dozen countries
as a global emergency on Thursday after the number of cases spiked more than
tenfold in a week.
The UN health agency defines an international
emergency as an “extraordinary event” that constitutes a risk to other
countries and requires a coordinated international response.
China first informed WHO about cases of the new
virus in late December. To date, China has reported more than 7,800 cases
including 170 deaths. Eighteen other countries have since reported cases, as
scientists race to understand how exactly the virus is spreading and how severe
it is.
Experts say there is significant evidence the virus
is spreading among people in China and have noted with concern instances in
other countries - including the United States, France, Japan, Germany, Canada,
South Korea and Vietnam - where there have also been isolated cases of
human-to-human transmission.
Speaking to reporters in Geneva, WHO
director-general Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus noted the worrisome spread of the
virus between people outside China.
“The main reason for this declaration is not because
of what is happening in China but because of what is happening in other countries,”
he said. “Our greatest concern is the potential for this virus to spread to
countries with weaker health systems which are ill-prepared to deal with it.”
“This declaration is not a vote of non-confidence in
China,” he said. “On the contrary, WHO continues to have the confidence in
China’s capacity to control the outbreak.”
A declaration of a global emergency typically brings
greater money and resources, but may also prompt nervous governments to
restrict travel and trade to affected countries. The announcement also imposes
more disease reporting requirements on countries.
In the wake of numerous airlines cancelling flights
to China and businesses including Starbucks and McDonald’s temporarily closing
hundreds of shops, Tedros said WHO was not recommending limiting travel or
trade to China.
“There is no reason for measures that unnecessarily
interfere with international travel and trade,” he said.
On Thursday, France confirmed that a doctor who was
in contact with a patient with the new virus later became infected himself. The
doctor is now being treated in an isolated room at a Paris hospital. Outbreak
specialists worry that the spread of new viruses from patients to health
workers can signal the virus is becoming adapted to human transmission.
China raised the death toll to 170 on Thursday and
more countries reported infections, including some spread locally, as foreign
evacuees from China’s worst-hit region returned home to medical tests and even
isolation.
Russia announced it was closing its 2,600-mile
border with China, joining Mongolia and North Korea in barring crossings to
guard against a new viral outbreak. It had been de facto closed because of the
Lunar New Year holiday, but Russian authorities said the closure would be
extended until March 1.
Meanwhile, the United States and South Korea
confirmed their first cases of person-to-person spread of the virus. The man in
the US is married to a 60-year-old Chicago woman who got sick from the virus
after she returned from a trip to Wuhan, the Chinese city that is the epicenter
of the outbreak.
The case in South Korea was a 56-year-old man who
had contact with a patient who was diagnosed with the new virus earlier.
Although scientists expect to see limited
transmission of the virus between people with close contact, like within
families, the instances of spread to people who may have had less exposure to
the virus in Japan and Germany is worrying.
In Japan, a man in his 60s caught the virus after
working as a bus driver for two tour groups from Wuhan. In Germany, a man in
his 30s was sickened after a Chinese colleague from Wuhan visited his office
for a business meeting. Three other workers at the same factory later became
infected. The woman had shown no symptoms of the virus until her flight back to
China.
“That’s the kind of transmission chain that we don’t
want to see,” said Marion Koopmans, an infectious diseases specialist at
Erasmus University Medical Center in the Netherlands and a member of WHO’s
emergency committee.
Koopmans said more information was needed about how
the virus was spread in these instances and whether it meant the virus was more
infectious than previously thought or if there was something unusual in those
circumstances.
Mark Harris, a professor of virology at Leeds
University, said it appears that the spread of the virus among people is
probably easier than initially presumed.
“If transmission between humans was difficult, then
the numbers would have plateaued,” he said.
Harris said the limited amount of virus spread
beyond China suggested the outbreak could still be contained, but that if
people are spreading the disease before they show symptoms - as some Chinese
politicians and researchers have suggested - that could compromise control
efforts.
The new virus has now infected more people in China
than were sickened there during the 2002-2003 outbreak of SARS, or severe acute
respiratory syndrome, a cousin of the new virus.
The latest figures for mainland China show an
increase of 38 deaths and 1,737 cases for a total of 7,736 confirmed cases. Of
the new deaths, 37 were in Hubei province, of which Wuhan is the capital, and
one was in the southwestern province of Sichuan. Outside China, there are 82
infections in 18 countries, according to WHO.
China extended its Lunar New Year holiday to Sunday
to try to keep people home, but the wave of returning travelers could
potentially cause the virus to spread further.
China has been largely praised for a swift and
effective response to the outbreak, although questions have been raised about
the police suppression of what were early on considered mere rumors - a
reflection of the one-party Communist state’s determination to maintain a
monopoly on information in spite of smart phones and social media.
That stands in stark contrast to the initial
response to SARS, when medical reports were hidden as state secrets. The
delayed response was blamed for allowing the disease to spread worldwide,
killing around 800 people.
Dr. Jeremy Farrar, director of Britain’s Wellcome
Trust, welcomed WHO’s emergency declaration.
“This virus has spread at unprecedented scale and
speed, with cases passing between people in multiple countries across the
world,” he said in a statement. “It is also a stark reminder of how vulnerable
we are to epidemics of infectious diseases known and unknown.”