John Bolton memoir reveals UK's fragile relations with Trump
Donald
Trump dashed British hopes that he would take a tougher line on Hong Kong,
including by refusing to condemn the Tiananmen Square massacre, according to
John Bolton’s book about his time as the US president’s national security
adviser.
In
one of many episodes in the book that reveal the fragile nature of the UK’s
relations with the Trump administration, Bolton writes that the president said
Tiananmen Square was decades ago and he did not want to jeopardise a potential
trade deal with Beijing.
Bolton
discloses that he started a social media campaign in mid-2019 in support of the
pro-democracy demonstrations in Hong Kong, and that the president had acknowledged
that the size of the rallies on 12 June was “a big deal”.
But
Trump then added: “I don’t want to get involved … We have human rights problems
too.”
Bolton
writes: “That pretty much ended my Twitter campaign pressing China to honour
its deal with Great Britain, highlighting how little respect China paid to
international agreements, for all those so excited at the prospect of a trade
deal.”
The
hawkish former adviser also reveals that during Trump’s UK state visit on 4
June last year, the 30th anniversary of Tiananmen Square, he refused to issue a
White House statement of commemoration. He writes that the treasury secretary,
Steve Mnuchin, told the president he was “worried about the effects of the
draft statement on the trade negotiations and wanted to water it down. That was
bad enough, but Trump said he didn’t want any statement at all. ‘That was 15 years
ago,’ he said, inaccurately. ‘Who cares about it? I’m trying to make a deal. I
don’t want anything.’ And that was that.”
The
contrast with Trump’s current strong defence of Hong Kong’s rights is striking
and underlines how the president will support his allies only if it happens to
coincide with US economic or political interests.
Bolton
reveals that Trump ranks Boris Johnson alongside the Japanese prime minister,
Shinzo Abe, as the world leaders to whom he is closest, while he thinks that
everything the French president, Emmanuel Macron, touches “turns to shit”.
Trump
and Theresa May shared a mutual dislike, Bolton writes, partly born of the US
president’s assessment that she had handled Brexit so disastrously that her
strategy was “in freefall”.
Bolton
also reveals that discussions with the UK about granting the Chinese firm
Huawei access to 5G contracts had been “very difficult, although attitudes
changed significantly once Johnson became prime minister and installed a new
cabinet. But even then it was hard slogging because of the high level of
dependence on Huawei that Britain had built up over an extended period.”
Bolton
discloses a surprising sympathy for the UK dilemma, writing: “These legitimate
worries should have led us to focus on rapidly getting new entrants into 5G
markets, not how we would mitigate the consequences of continuing to patronize
Huawei.”
Bolton
also writes that as foreign secretary, Johnson did not raise many objections
when he was told that the US planned to leave the Iran nuclear deal signed by
Barack Obama in 2015. Bolton says Johnson “stressed that Britain fully
understood the existing deal’s weaknesses, which would have surprised many
supporters who still worshipped at its altar”. He also chastises the Johnson
government for not holding firm with Iran after it released an Iranian oil
tanker seized off Gibraltar, saying Iran had learned lessons from the UK’s lack
of resolve.
Bolton
complains that few in Washington apart from himself and Trump cared about
Brexit. He writes: “Brexit was an existential issue for the UK, but it was also
critically important to the US. Brexit’s fundamental impetus was the
accelerating loss of citizen control over the Brussels-based mechanisms of the
European Union. Bureaucracies were making rules that national parliaments had
to accept as binding, and the loss of democratic sovereignty was increasingly
palpable.
“We
should have been doing far more to help the Brexiteers, and I certainly tried.”




